On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:09:34PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Got some logs. Note that nmbd runs *before* dhclient binds
Why is the nmbd.c:696 message 'empty'?
Olaf,
Samba 2:3.6.5-5 contains a patch that
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:09:34PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Got some logs. Note that nmbd runs *before* dhclient binds
Why is the nmbd.c:696 message 'empty'?
Olaf,
Samba 2:3.6.5-5 contains a patch that allows running nmbd when no network
interfaces have been assigned an address. Does
Got some logs. Note that nmbd runs *before* dhclient binds
Why is the nmbd.c:696 message 'empty'?
Olaf
log.nmbd:
[2012/05/28 20:40:54, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:857(main) nmbd version 3.5.6
started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010
[2012/05/28 20:40:54.748233, 0]
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
I'm sorry for replying so late after your bug report. It apparently
escaped our attention.
With so few elements, I'm not sure wecan do much.
Is there a possibility that you increase the log level to 3 in
smb.conf
Quoting Olaf van der Spek (olafvds...@gmail.com):
Package: samba
Version: 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze5
Severity: normal
Hi,
In my VMs, Samba sometimes fails to start at boot. The nmbd process isn't
running in that case.
A restart brings it back to live.
I see this line in nmbd.log:
Package: samba
Version: 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze5
Severity: normal
Hi,
In my VMs, Samba sometimes fails to start at boot. The nmbd process isn't
running in that case.
A restart brings it back to live.
I see this line in nmbd.log:
[2011/10/20 10:25:19.149863, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:696(open_sockets)
#
6 matches
Mail list logo