severity 649151 important
thanks
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I agree, Jonathan, that lack of documentation is not so severe an issue
that Debian would be better off released without CDBS. I merely had no
desire to play severity ping-pong or argue with
Hi Jonathan,
On 12-05-25 at 11:27pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
My idea is to...
1. Convert the official documentation to (Pandoc flavor of)
Markdown
2. Convert and merge in the unofficial documentation
3. Convert translations of unofficial documentation
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
That underlying issue apart, contributions to documentation is much
appreciated - both aimed at newcomers and existing users, and both
editing old pieces and writing new stuff from scratch.
Thanks. First, the more basic question: what is so bad about cyclic
On 12-05-26 at 06:11am, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
That underlying issue apart, contributions to documentation is much
appreciated - both aimed at newcomers and existing users, and both
editing old pieces and writing new stuff from scratch.
what is so bad about
Hi Jonas,
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
This bug originates from a commit [1], I could not find any mentioned
reason for it.
1:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/cdbs.git;a=commit;h=6b0828d3925098f6f0baf83cc798413066f544df
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
My idea is to...
1.
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.94ubuntu1
Severity: important
The cdbs package (up to the most recent version to date, 0.4.99) doesn't contain
any documentation. The upstream package contains docbook documentation, and
there
is documentation on-line, but there should also be documentation included in
6 matches
Mail list logo
