On 17/09/13 03:13, Rogério Brito wrote:
Just a warning here: I am a novice in Java-land (I wrote a toy compiler in
Java in 1998, but that sincerely doesn't count, as I can't remember a thing
and the language changed a lot).
That being said, I may, perhaps, spend some time with it, as many of
Hi there.
On Sep 07 2013, Andrew Ross wrote:
My intention was always to package Gephi under the banner of the Java
team. Unfortunately the Netbeans platform is a dependency, and getting
that in a good state (and keeping up with upstream releases) has been
more challenging than I initially
Hi all,
My intention was always to package Gephi under the banner of the Java
team. Unfortunately the Netbeans platform is a dependency, and getting
that in a good state (and keeping up with upstream releases) has been
more challenging than I initially expected. When I started on this, the
only
Hi there again.
On Sep 02 2013, Rogério Brito wrote:
I wonder if, somehow, changing to team-maintenance wouldn't be better for
the package overall? Perhaps the highly skilled people that already package
Java things for Debian may be interested in this? I'm CCing them.
Otherwise, changing
Hi there.
On Mar 04 2013, Ximin Luo wrote:
Hi, apparently there is a proper Debianised effort (adhering to Debian's
dyn-link and source licensing requirements) going on:
http://wiki.gephi.org/index.php/Specification_-_Debian_Package
From a quick look at that, I see that there are very few
Hi, apparently there is a proper Debianised effort (adhering to Debian's
dyn-link and source licensing requirements) going on:
http://wiki.gephi.org/index.php/Specification_-_Debian_Package
I've CC'd the person in charge of that page here.
Andy, could you give us an update on how this is going?
6 matches
Mail list logo
