Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils

2012-05-26 Thread Joey Hess
Georgios M. Zarkadas wrote: just FYI, GNU parallel is already in Wheezy, in a way that does not conflict with moreutils (cf. the last messages in Bug#518696). And which breaks ikiwiki-hosting if it's installed along with parallel. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils

2012-05-26 Thread Joey Hess
I think it's illustrative of the upstream for GNU parallel that - It includes a /usr/bin/sql program, which is the best example of namespace pollution I have ever thought of. - It has a completely absurd number of options including gems such as --skip-first-line (because tail is too hard?),

Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils

2012-05-25 Thread Georgios M. Zarkadas
Στις 24-05-2012, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 21:11 +0100, ο/η Ian Jackson έγραψε: Joey Hess writes (Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils): Ian Jackson wrote: Ah, I'm sorry, I must have misunderstood your comments in #597050. I took them for an objection, rather

Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils

2012-05-25 Thread Ian Jackson
Georgios M. Zarkadas writes (Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils): just FYI, GNU parallel is already in Wheezy, in a way that does not conflict with moreutils (cf. the last messages in Bug#518696). Excellent, thanks. I'm closing 665851 then. Ian

Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils

2012-05-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Joey Hess writes (Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils): Ian Jackson wrote: Ah, I'm sorry, I must have misunderstood your comments in #597050. I took them for an objection, rather than a request for help. I sent a grand total of two sentances to that bug

Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils

2012-03-26 Thread Joey Hess
Ian Jackson wrote: Ah, I'm sorry, I must have misunderstood your comments in #597050. I took them for an objection, rather than a request for help. I sent a grand total of two sentances to that bug report. I will assume that I have not had any time to work on it did not cause that