* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [140803 04:00]:
As previously agreed in the IRC meeting, I call for votes on this question
with the following ballot options:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited in
main
B non-free packages should always be
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 07:56:41PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited in
main
B non-free packages should always be prohibited in package dependencies for
main
FD
I vote: B A FD.
(Rationale:
Steve Langasek writes (Bug#681419: Alternative dependencies on non-free
packages in main: Call for Votes):
As previously agreed in the IRC meeting, I call for votes on this question
with the following ballot options:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014, Steve Langasek wrote:
As previously agreed in the IRC meeting, I call for votes on this question
with the following ballot options:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited in
main
B non-free packages should always be prohibited in
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
As previously agreed in the IRC meeting, I call for votes on this question
with the following ballot options:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited in
main
B non-free packages should always be prohibited in
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 07:56:41PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
As previously agreed in the IRC meeting, I call for votes on this question
with the following ballot options:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited in
main
B non-free packages should
As previously agreed in the IRC meeting, I call for votes on this question
with the following ballot options:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited in
main
B non-free packages should always be prohibited in package dependencies for
main
FD
Whereas:
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
As previously agreed in the IRC meeting, I call for votes on this
question with the following ballot options:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited in
main
B non-free packages should always be prohibited in
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
As previously agreed in the IRC meeting, I call for votes on this question
with the following ballot options:
A non-free packages as non-default alternatives should not be prohibited in
main
B non-free packages should always be prohibited in
9 matches
Mail list logo
