On dim., 2013-01-20 at 00:44 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Thanks for confirming that
It is possible that I bootstrapped 3.1.7 on an earlier Debian version
than 3.1.8. E.g. Maybe 3.1.7 was bootstrapped on lenny and 3.1.8 on
squeeze. This would mean different versions of autoconf were
On 20/01/13 10:14, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2013-01-20 at 00:44 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Thanks for confirming that
It is possible that I bootstrapped 3.1.7 on an earlier Debian version
than 3.1.8. E.g. Maybe 3.1.7 was bootstrapped on lenny and 3.1.8 on
squeeze. This would
On dim., 2013-01-20 at 10:40 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
In practice, people do stuff like this every day, but usually when
compiling for a single platform where they can see the results
themselves. I just don't know if there is some more pedantic approach
to managing this type of risk for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20/01/13 10:44, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2013-01-20 at 10:40 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
In practice, people do stuff like this every day, but usually
when compiling for a single platform where they can see the
results themselves.
On dim., 2013-01-20 at 11:03 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
We're not interested in binary packages in Debian but you're indeed
free to do that kind of QA work upstream.
I'm not quite sure what you mean there... any package produced by
dpkg-buildpackage is, by definition, a binary package,
Hi
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:14:26AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
[...]
If we need to be that pedantic about it to put something into squeeze
(which may well be a good idea), then maybe we need to make the change
without building and releasing any of the actual binaries, just
release
On dim., 2013-01-20 at 13:07 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
So I have verified the following things:
- The debdiff contains only the mentioned change (debdiff attached).
- The patch is applied to /usr/share/ganglia-webfrontend/graph.php in
the produced binary package
Hi
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2013-01-20 at 13:07 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
So I have verified the following things:
- The debdiff contains only the mentioned change (debdiff attached).
- The patch is applied to
On 19/01/13 21:52, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Daniel, hi all
Ok let's try to reassume (I feel like there is some confusion ;-))
Squeeze currently has ganglia 3.1.7-1. So the updated package needs to
be based on this. Usually introducing a new upstream version is not
accepted for
Hi Daniel, hi Yves-Alexis
In short, [1] looks to be the only change needed for the security
update. So the debdiff I posted should be okay. But I will leave it to
Yves-Alexis (who is Debian Security Team member) which way to go.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:15:00PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On
On 20/01/13 00:02, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Daniel, hi Yves-Alexis
In short, [1] looks to be the only change needed for the security
update. So the debdiff I posted should be okay. But I will leave it to
Yves-Alexis (who is Debian Security Team member) which way to go.
On Sat, Jan
11 matches
Mail list logo
