Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-21 Thread Nick Leverton
Thanks also Bart for reminding me of the other approach. (sorry I am a bit distracted by home things at the moment). After some thought I think it makes sense to change to the umask approach anyway, as it is more efficient (fewer fork/execs), and also covers the case where the symlink exists but

Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-21 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Nick, On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:29:28AM +0100, Nick Leverton wrote: Thanks also Bart for reminding me of the other approach. My pleasure. (sorry I am a bit distracted by home things at the moment). No problem at all. diff -Nru nullmailer-1.11/debian/postinst

Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 21.08.2012 19:51, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Nick, On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:29:28AM +0100, Nick Leverton wrote: Thanks also Bart for reminding me of the other approach. My pleasure. (sorry I am a bit distracted by home things at the moment). No problem at all. diff -Nru

Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-20 Thread Nick Leverton
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:16:50AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: If bartm is unable to upload this, I will do it. However, you need to first check that /etc/nullmailer/remotes is a regular file, as it would be a perfectly reasonable configuration to have replaced /etc/nullmailer/remotes with a

Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-20 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Nick, How about the umask-touch-chmod approach we discussed via private e-mail ? That would also work for a symlink if I'm not mistaken. (This is just a suggestion. I don't mind that you and Don proceed in a different way.) Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-19 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Nick Leverton wrote: * New upstream release diff -Nru nullmailer-1.11/debian/postinst nullmailer-1.11/debian/postinst --- nullmailer-1.11/debian/postinst 2012-05-16 08:25:36.0 +0100 +++ nullmailer-1.11/debian/postinst 2012-08-12 20:23:46.0 +0100 @@

Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 13.08.2012 00:18, Nick Leverton wrote: [] diff -Nru nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog --- nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog 2012-06-16 16:36:28.0 +0100 +++ nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog 2012-08-11 23:55:36.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@

Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-13 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:51:16AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: On 13.08.2012 00:18, Nick Leverton wrote: [] diff -Nru nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog --- nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog2012-06-16 16:36:28.0 +0100 +++

Bug#684679: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.11-2 (security bugfix upload request)

2012-08-12 Thread Nick Leverton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nullmailer, which I hope will qualify for a freeze exception as this upload fixes a new security issue. (I haven't yet approached ftp-masters about this though). Package name: nullmailer