On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 02:33 +0400, hr...@infotech.am wrote:
Yeah, Bug is not completely disappeared,
my test was done in new formatted partition, which was almost free, and no
any error was appeared for image 160Gb.
But when I tried to format 160Gb image file on the other machine, where
the
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 01:27 +0400, Nikita Gubenko wrote:
Guys, any update on this bug? Can reproduce on 3.2.0-4-amd64 with vhd image.
We're still waiting for someone to report results after applying the
patches from http://bugs.debian.org/685726#42.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to
Yeah, Bug is not completely disappeared,
my test was done in new formatted partition, which was almost free, and no
any error was appeared for image 160Gb.
But when I tried to format 160Gb image file on the other machine, where
the 2Tb partition is full more than 80% and fragmented, I could
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 16:50 +0400, hr...@infotech.am wrote:
The problem solved in Debian Wheezy for kernel
linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.32-1 amd64 Linux 3.2 for 64-bit PCs
Are you sure? This doesn't include any of the changes that were
expected to fix this bug, as you did not report that
The problem solved in Debian Wheezy for kernel
linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.32-1 amd64 Linux 3.2 for 64-bit PCs
Hrayr.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 14:11 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:09:05PM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
As discussed, Linux 3.2.y needs a backport of the fixes for this, which
I think are:
968dee7 ext4: fix hole punch failure when depth is greater than 0
89a4e48 ext4:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:09:05PM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
As discussed, Linux 3.2.y needs a backport of the fixes for this, which
I think are:
968dee7 ext4: fix hole punch failure when depth is greater than 0
89a4e48 ext4: fix kernel BUG on large-scale rm -rf commands
I have a backport
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 00:56 +0400, hr...@infotech.am wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 03:30 +0400, Hrayr Grigoryan wrote:
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.23-1
Severity: critical
Tags: lfs
Justification: causes serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
When I'm trying to format file
As discussed, Linux 3.2.y needs a backport of the fixes for this, which
I think are:
968dee7 ext4: fix hole punch failure when depth is greater than 0
89a4e48 ext4: fix kernel BUG on large-scale rm -rf commands
Ben.
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 00:56 +0400, hr...@infotech.am wrote:
On Fri,
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 03:30 +0400, Hrayr Grigoryan wrote:
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.23-1
Severity: critical
Tags: lfs
Justification: causes serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
When I'm trying to format file image with the command mkfs -t ext4
file.img, it returns the following
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 03:30 +0400, Hrayr Grigoryan wrote:
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.23-1
Severity: critical
Tags: lfs
Justification: causes serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
When I'm trying to format file image with the command mkfs -t ext4
file.img, it returns the following
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.23-1
Severity: critical
Tags: lfs
Justification: causes serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
When I'm trying to format file image with the command mkfs -t ext4
file.img, it returns the following errors
[ 142.328065] EXT4-fs error (device sdb1):
12 matches
Mail list logo
