On Wednesday 05 September 2012 01:23 AM, grin wrote:
Which init do you particularly have in mind? I can install anything on my test
VMs until I send them to oblivion. :-) [I'll check them though.]
systemd seems to have the most interest right now.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT -
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 01:23 AM, grin wrote:
Which init do you particularly have in mind? I can install anything on my
test
VMs until I send them to oblivion. :-) [I'll check them though.]
systemd seems to
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 06:44 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
Interesting; popcon says systemd 600+ installed while systemd-sysv is
around 70; this is versus upstart 250 installs. I'll try to check
them.
I guess most are still passing it as the kernel argument and exploring
it. No one wants a
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 06:44 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
Interesting; popcon says systemd 600+ installed while systemd-sysv is
around 70; this is versus upstart 250 installs. I'll try to check
them.
I guess most
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 11:13 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
Upstart works and requires the patch, but as far as I see it's not
really upstarty: it closely emulates sysvinit and doesn't do neither
event driven runs nor parallel processing, so no surprise here.
For systemd I have to pull up to
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 11:17 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 11:13 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
Upstart works and requires the patch, but as far as I see it's not
really upstarty: it closely emulates sysvinit and doesn't do neither
event driven runs nor
On Monday 03 September 2012 10:32 PM, Peter Gervai wrote:
My devices reside on multiple hosts using all kinds of troublesome parameters
(drbd, slow links, virtualised machines, etc)
which results 2-3 seconds between iscsi login and the devices recognised by
the kernel. open-iscsi start
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:33:58 +0530
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote:
The patch looks okay to me. But I am not sure which way we want to go. A
better approach could be to use a udev rule. Also someone needs to test
this scenario with the newer event based init daemons.
Mine was a
Package: open-iscsi
Version: 2.0.873-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
My devices reside on multiple hosts using all kinds of troublesome parameters
(drbd, slow links, virtualised machines, etc)
which results 2-3 seconds between iscsi login and the devices recognised by the
kernel. open-iscsi
9 matches
Mail list logo
