Hello Don,
thanks a lot for your kind reply!
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:27:37 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
I believe the only correct way to implement this is to have a new SOAP
call which actually asked for bugs which affected a list of packages
which had particular severity; it would be
Control: block 536613 by -1
Control: unblock 536613 by 553661
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 10:38:59 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:38:50 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
[...]
I would need to call get_bugs() so that it
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Francesco Poli wrote:
The fact is that the enhanced get_bugs() I would need would anyway
have to internally map binary packages and binary versions to source
packages and source versions. During this process, it would anyway
find any non-existing binary packages among the
Control: block 257873 by -1
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:38:50 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
[...]
I would need to call get_bugs() so that it returned an array with
all the (unarchived) bug-numbers that apply to the specified binary
version of one
Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
as discussed via private e-mail with Don Armstrong, I would need the
following enhancement in the BTS SOAP interface, in order to enhance
apt-listbugs (which I maintain).
Currently, one of the procedures that apt-listbugs calls via SOAP is
get_bugs(),
5 matches
Mail list logo