Hi David
I uploaded your package, with the following small change: Version
number changed from 2.2-1.1 (NMU version number scheme) to 2.2-2 (as
you are maintainer).
Not required, but would help: Add patch header to the patches you add
in debian/patch, see [1].
[1]:
Hi Salvatore
Hi David
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +, David Weber wrote:
Hi David
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:06:53AM +, David Weber wrote:
Attached is the debdiff contianing these three refreshed for the
version in unstable and testing. But I'm not yet ready
Hi David and Guido
Thanks for the further update. Guido are you sponsoring also this
upload from David (as you might better know sanlock). If you have not
time at the moment I can try to to upload David's update in the
comming days.
Regards,
Salvatore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Salvatore,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:20:26AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi David and Guido
Thanks for the further update. Guido are you sponsoring also this
upload from David (as you might better know sanlock). If you have not
time at the moment I can try to to upload David's
Hi David
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:06:53AM +, David Weber wrote:
Attached is the debdiff contianing these three refreshed for the
version in unstable and testing. But I'm not yet ready to propose a
NMU. Testing of the resulting package is welcome!
Thanks for the debdiff!
Hi David
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +, David Weber wrote:
Hi David
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:06:53AM +, David Weber wrote:
Attached is the debdiff contianing these three refreshed for the
version in unstable and testing. But I'm not yet ready to propose a
NMU.
Attached is the debdiff contianing these three refreshed for the
version in unstable and testing. But I'm not yet ready to propose a
NMU. Testing of the resulting package is welcome!
Thanks for the debdiff!
It works as expected: It creates the files with the right
permissions without
Hi David
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:06:53AM +, David Weber wrote:
Attached is the debdiff contianing these three refreshed for the
version in unstable and testing. But I'm not yet ready to propose a
NMU. Testing of the resulting package is welcome!
Thanks for the debdiff!
It works
Hi
Only a small follow-up. David (Maintainer of sanlock) will have a look
at this in the upcoming week.
Regards,
Salvatore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:29:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
attached is a possible patch for that issue. This is just a starting
point, as I was not able to test the patch myself. Also, I used 660 as
permissions to the file, I'm not sure of whether it's sensible or not.
Please review
Hello,
attached is a possible patch for that issue. This is just a starting
point, as I was not able to test the patch myself. Also, I used 660 as
permissions to the file, I'm not sure of whether it's sensible or not.
Please review and test before applying.
HTH anyway,
Mt.
--
Nous avons neuf
11 matches
Mail list logo
