Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote (21 Jan 2013 21:09:43 GMT) :
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 21:15:54 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
If you have more intel on the impacts of that change, you've got all
my attention. Either way, I guess we want that into rc1 to spot any
regressions coming from alsa-utils, so
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (12/01/2013):
OK as far as I'm concerned, but needs a d-i ack.
* Drop debian/udev.{rules,script} entirely and just rely on upstream's
simpler udev rule file. Our rules were wrong or pointless.
If you have more intel on the impacts of that change, you've got
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 21:15:54 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (12/01/2013):
OK as far as I'm concerned, but needs a d-i ack.
* Drop debian/udev.{rules,script} entirely and just rely on upstream's
simpler udev rule file. Our rules were wrong or
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 18:41:11 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package alsa-utils.
OK as far as I'm concerned, but needs a d-i ack.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package alsa-utils.
It fixes RC bug #697651
Dropping the udev rule in [1] caused a major regression compared to the
version in squeeze, since this broke restoring of mixer
5 matches
Mail list logo
