Le 20/01/2013 06:20, Vasudev Kamath a écrit :
On 22:00 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash
betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim
in the
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
What about libopenzim as package name, content unchanged?
Looks reasonable to me.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Raphael, Kelson
On 10:14 Sun 20 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
What about libopenzim as package name, content unchanged?
Looks reasonable to me.
I just talked with Kelson what he meant is only package renaming and
nothing will be changed
On 22:00 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash
betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim
in the package name there is description field which
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
* Package name: zimlib
Version : 0.93.20121015-1
* URL : http://www.openzim.org/index.php/Zimlib
.
ZIM is a file format created with focus on extracting and encoding data
from Mediawiki for offline use. Even though
Git repository for zimlib shows rename was done in 2009, zim was
already a few years old at that time.
Afraid little I can do to resolve the clash other than renaming my
application, which needless to say, I don't want to because I like the
name.
Regards,
Jaap
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM,
Hi Raphaël,
On 10:00 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
snip
When I saw this, it got me clearly confused because at first I thought
that it was related to http://zim-wiki.org/. It's a bit unfortunate that
Zim is used to refer to two projects reladed to wikis.
zim in zimlib is actually
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I will ask upstream
Thanks.
But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make
sense. What do you think?
I don't agree with this statement. Coming up with a name is always a
creative endeavour and you can always come up with
Engelheart kel...@kiwix.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of
ZIM specifications
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: 20130114101420.ga9...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I will ask upstream
Thanks.
Just an update Emmanuel started a discussion on whether to get the
project renamed and possible names here [1]
He has asked me for some time before he can revert back on
Hi Raphaël,
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I will ask upstream
Thanks.
But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make
sense. What do you think?
I don't agree with this statement. Coming up with a
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash
betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim
in the package name there is description field which clarifies any
confusion between both packages for end
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com
* Package name: zimlib
Version : 0.93.20121015-1
Upstream Author : Tommi Maekitalo to...@tntnet.org
* URL : http://www.openzim.org/index.php/Zimlib
* License : GPL-2
Programming
13 matches
Mail list logo
