Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights

2014-01-28 Thread Chris Knadle
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 06:55:45 Tollef Fog Heen wrote: ]] Chris Knadle I'll just mention that the proposal of switching out the default init system in jessie+1 sounds a bit scary, as it will change a basic administration interface in the middle of a Stable support period.

Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights (was: Bug#727708: init system gr override - formal resolution proposal)

2014-01-27 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com writes: Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: I hereby propose the following resolution: 1. The Technical Committee does not wish any resolutions it passes about the init system question(s) to stand in the face of any contrary view

Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights (was: Bug#727708: init system gr override - formal resolution proposal)

2014-01-27 Thread Chris Knadle
On Monday, January 27, 2014 18:52:45 Nikolaus Rath wrote: Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com writes: Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: I hereby propose the following resolution: 1. The Technical Committee does not wish any resolutions it passes about the init system

Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights

2014-01-27 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Chris Knadle I'll just mention that the proposal of switching out the default init system in jessie+1 sounds a bit scary, as it will change a basic administration interface in the middle of a Stable support period. Probably the most interesting scenarios with this involve servers