* Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net, 2014-10-01, 20:48:
@Jörg: I think shotwell is a true positive. The binary is - by readelf
- identified as a shared object.
$ readelf -h unpack/usr/lib/shotwell-video-thumbnailer | grep Type:
Type: DYN (Shared object file)
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2014-09-24 11:06, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
severity 731987 important
thanks
Hello,
the same in lintian/2.5.27 by testing shotwell/0.20.0-1.
The test sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname causes false
positive Errors on binaries.
I think
On 1 October 2014 19:48, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
@Reuben: Do you have an example package that suffers from the
false-positive?
Sure, see https://github.com/rrthomas/paper
If I remove paper-bin.lintian-overrides, I get an incorrect warning from
lintian when building the
severity 731987 important
thanks
Hello,
the same in lintian/2.5.27 by testing shotwell/0.20.0-1.
The test sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname causes false
positive Errors on binaries.
I think the severity minor is to small. Therefore I set it to important.
CU
Jörg
--
pgp
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.19ubuntu1
Severity: minor
libexec binaries trip the
sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname lintian rule, though
they're not shared libraries.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers trusty-updates
APT policy: (500,
5 matches
Mail list logo
