Am 22.06.2014 20:55, schrieb Marius Kotsbak:
2014-06-19 0:02 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
Am 14.06.2014 01:28, schrieb Marius Kotsbak:
No, I think it is ready to be uploaded now.
Should I or Guido sponsor the upload?
I'm fine with sponsoring the upload. In that case, could
2014-06-19 0:02 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
Am 14.06.2014 01:28, schrieb Marius Kotsbak:
No, I think it is ready to be uploaded now.
Should I or Guido sponsor the upload?
I'm fine with sponsoring the upload. In that case, could you point me to
a .dsc. I'd be happy to make
❦ 20 avril 2014 11:38 +0200, Marius Kotsbak mar...@kotsbak.com :
Any progres here. I'd be awesome to have an updated package in
Debian.
I pushed an update now. Will test if qmi-proxy is working. It could
probably be done by running qmicli when Mobile radio monitor
Am 14.06.2014 01:28, schrieb Marius Kotsbak:
No, I think it is ready to be uploaded now.
Should I or Guido sponsor the upload?
I'm fine with sponsoring the upload. In that case, could you point me to
a .dsc. I'd be happy to make the upload.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the
2014-04-13 12:33 GMT+02:00 Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
Hi
It is actually almost ready in the git repo I have pushed.
Any progres here. I'd be awesome to have an updated package in Debian.
I pushed an update now.
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
Hi
It is actually almost ready in the git repo I have pushed.
Any progres here. I'd be awesome to have an updated package in Debian.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
2014-02-11 8:04 GMT+01:00 Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:36:46PM +0100, Marius B. Kotsbak wrote:
On 07. feb. 2014 08:14, Guido Günther wrote:
blocks 737572 731851
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:00:52PM +0100, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
[..snip..]
I still don't understand why you can't leave it in /usr/lib/arcH?
Done it like that and pushed now. Then it will be up to the user to avoid
conflicts between different qmi-proxy running at the same time against the
On 07. feb. 2014 08:14, Guido Günther wrote:
blocks 737572 731851
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
Hi
It is actually almost ready in the git repo I have pushed.
The remaining thing is to find out how to handle the qmi-proxy binary,
which is
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:36:46PM +0100, Marius B. Kotsbak wrote:
On 07. feb. 2014 08:14, Guido Günther wrote:
blocks 737572 731851
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
Hi
It is actually almost ready in the git repo I have pushed.
blocks 737572 731851
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
Hi
It is actually almost ready in the git repo I have pushed.
The remaining thing is to find out how to handle the qmi-proxy binary,
which is used by the lib.
The binary is libexecdir so it
Hi
It is actually almost ready in the git repo I have pushed.
The remaining thing is to find out how to handle the qmi-proxy binary,
which is used by the lib.
As only one can be running at the same time, I am unsure how we should
handle multiarch and different major ABI versions. Either
Hey Marius,
From my point of view it should conflict - I wasn't aware that it was
used in things other than modemmanager, but that makes sense. I am
hoping to help get a newer version of modemmanager into Debian
eventually.
--Adam
On 4 February 2014 20:21, Marius Kotsbak mar...@kotsbak.com
Yes, there are other clients, like qmicli. Okay, and how to ensure
conflicting between architectures? Stop it being multiarch, or is it a
better way?
On 4 February 2014 21:33, Marius Kotsbak mar...@kotsbak.com wrote:
Yes, there are other clients, like qmicli. Okay, and how to ensure
conflicting between architectures? Stop it being multiarch, or is it a
better way?
I think for the moment it can be non-multiarch and a bug can be added
for it.
Package: libqmi-glib-dev
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
git-buildpackage works fine against upstream 1.8.0 and it will be required for
new modemmanager packages.
How can I help here?
Thanks,
Adam
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy:
16 matches
Mail list logo
