Bug#741637:

2014-03-17 Thread Tobias Frost
Hi Olly, I've asked in #debian-ftp to avoid me raising libxapian22's priority and then discovering they'd prefer to demote aptitude instead. Cheers, Olly thanks for feedback. I'm not clear about your chatt.. ftpmaster sees that as a bug in aptitude and likes to demote aptidue from

Bug#741637: libxapian22: Please raise package priority to important

2014-03-17 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: -1 affects aptitude Control: 741635 affects aptitude (sorry, hitted send accidentially; I just wanted to comment my view on the policy.) While this certainly needs addressing, and I'm fine with changing libxapian22 if that's what if preferred, policy doesn't appear to justify filing

Bug#741637:

2014-03-17 Thread Olly Betts
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 07:28:25AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: I've asked in #debian-ftp to avoid me raising libxapian22's priority and then discovering they'd prefer to demote aptitude instead. thanks for feedback. I'm not clear about your chatt.. ftpmaster sees that as a bug in aptitude

Bug#741637: libxapian22: Please raise package priority to important

2014-03-16 Thread Olly Betts
Severity: important thanks On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:12:48PM +0100, coldtobi wrote: during testing of a script to check for Policy 2.5 requirments, I saw that aptitude (priority important) depends on libxapian22 (Prioity optional). Quoting the policy: Packages must not depend on packages

Bug#741637: libxapian22: Please raise package priority to important

2014-03-14 Thread coldtobi
Package: libxapian22 Version: 1.2.17-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.5 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, during testing of a script to check for Policy 2.5 requirments, I saw that aptitude (priority important) depends on libxapian22 (Prioity optional). Quoting