Hi Olly,
I've asked in #debian-ftp to avoid me raising libxapian22's priority
and then discovering they'd prefer to demote aptitude instead.
Cheers,
Olly
thanks for feedback. I'm not clear about your chatt.. ftpmaster sees that as a
bug in aptitude and likes to demote
aptidue from
Control: -1 affects aptitude
Control: 741635 affects aptitude
(sorry, hitted send accidentially; I just wanted to comment my view on
the policy.)
While this certainly needs addressing, and I'm fine with changing
libxapian22 if that's what if preferred, policy doesn't appear to
justify filing
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 07:28:25AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
I've asked in #debian-ftp to avoid me raising libxapian22's priority
and then discovering they'd prefer to demote aptitude instead.
thanks for feedback. I'm not clear about your chatt.. ftpmaster sees
that as a bug in aptitude
Severity: important
thanks
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:12:48PM +0100, coldtobi wrote:
during testing of a script to check for Policy 2.5 requirments, I saw that
aptitude (priority important)
depends on libxapian22 (Prioity optional).
Quoting the policy:
Packages must not depend on packages
Package: libxapian22
Version: 1.2.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
during testing of a script to check for Policy 2.5 requirments, I saw that
aptitude (priority important)
depends on libxapian22 (Prioity optional).
Quoting
5 matches
Mail list logo