Hi Seth,
On Wed, 2017 Oct 4 18:39-0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Thanks for tackling this Daniel,
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:09:02PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> > alias /etc/chromium-browser/ -> /etc/chromium/,
> > alias /usr/bin/chromium-browser -> /usr/bin/chromium,
> > alias
Thanks for tackling this Daniel,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:09:02PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> alias /etc/chromium-browser/ -> /etc/chromium/,
> alias /usr/bin/chromium-browser -> /usr/bin/chromium,
> alias /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser-sandbox ->
>
On Sat, 2017 Sep 30 19:19+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> > #include
>
> This file is currently not included in Debian's apparmor package.
> @intrigeri, can this be added? I assume we don't want other packages
> to mess around in abstractions? If not I can pull the code from that
> file into the
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:09:02PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Fri, 2017 Sep 29 00:18+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >
> > Attaching to this the report is fine. I can handle it from there.
>
> Okay, greatly appreciated. My current profile is attached. Please Cc: me
> on the new bug
Hi,
Guido Günther:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:09:02PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
>> #include
> This file is currently not included in Debian's apparmor
> package. @intrigeri, can this be added?
Before r1608 (in Vcs-Bzr) we shipped that file in
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:09:02PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Fri, 2017 Sep 29 00:18+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >
> > Attaching to this the report is fine. I can handle it from there.
>
> Okay, greatly appreciated. My current profile is attached. Please Cc: me
> on the new
On Fri, 2017 Sep 29 00:18+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> Attaching to this the report is fine. I can handle it from there.
Okay, greatly appreciated. My current profile is attached. Please Cc: me
on the new bug report.
As it happens, this file is identical to the current version of the
profile
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 05:20:51PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Thu, 2017 Sep 28 22:07+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >
> > I would have hoped you'd simply report wishlist bug against chromium
> > with the new profile attached? This gives us a bug to track for futher
> > discussion. I'd
On Thu, 2017 Sep 28 22:07+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> I would have hoped you'd simply report wishlist bug against chromium
> with the new profile attached? This gives us a bug to track for futher
> discussion. I'd do it myself but my profile is less well tested since
> I just hacked it up a
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 03:07:15PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Thu, 2017 Sep 28 11:21+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >
> > > That would amount to the Debian Chromium maintainers becoming the
> > > new upstream for the profile. (Apparmor is basically maintained by
> >
> > Or maybe people
On Thu, 2017 Sep 28 11:21+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> > That would amount to the Debian Chromium maintainers becoming the
> > new upstream for the profile. (Apparmor is basically maintained by
>
> Or maybe people caring about the chromium profile like you, me and
> others in this thread.
You
Guido Günther:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:47:27PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
>> That would amount to the Debian Chromium maintainers becoming the new
>> upstream for the profile.
> Or maybe people caring about the chromium profile like you, me and
> others in this thread.
Fine with me,
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:47:27PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Wed, 2017 Sep 27 22:26+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >
> > Great! I'm a big fan of doing things upstream but from my pov I'd
> > consider apparmor or chromium to be upstream not Ubuntu. What about
> > filing a bug against
On Wed, 2017 Sep 27 22:26+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> Great! I'm a big fan of doing things upstream but from my pov I'd
> consider apparmor or chromium to be upstream not Ubuntu. What about
> filing a bug against the Debian chromium package with an updated
> profile as a start? We can then take
Hi Richard,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:49:48PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> Hi Guido!
>
> On Wed, 2017 Sep 27 15:31+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >
> > I stumbled across this today again since I was looking for a chromium
> > profile and still had one in
Hi Guido!
On Wed, 2017 Sep 27 15:31+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> I stumbled across this today again since I was looking for a chromium
> profile and still had one in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.chromium-browser
> so it seems the fix for 742829 didn't remove existing files:
>
>$ dpkg -S
control: reopen -1 742829
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:31:26PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 03:21:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > which was filed against the apparmor-profiles
17 matches
Mail list logo
