On 29/04/16 22:33, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> We talked about this on the RT meeting yesterday and agreed to bump
>> this to RC again. We wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8
>> just for lilypond's sake, and it is better to act now that
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> We talked about this on the RT meeting yesterday and agreed to bump
> this to RC again. We wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8
> just for lilypond's sake, and it is better to act now that there's
> plenty of time before the freeze so
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
We talked about this on the RT meeting yesterday and agreed to bump this to RC
again. We wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8 just for lilypond's
sake, and it is better to act now that there's plenty of time before the freeze
so that a new version can
On 06/05/15 16:41, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> On Tue, 05 May 2015, Rob Browning wrote:
>> Don Armstrong writes:
>>
>>> At this juncture, I'm OK with expending the effort myself to keep
>>> guile-1.8 working with lilypond as the sole reverse
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 06/05/15 16:41, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 important
> >
> > On Tue, 05 May 2015, Rob Browning wrote:
> >> Don Armstrong writes:
> >>
> >>> At this juncture, I'm OK with expending the effort myself
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Rob Browning wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes:
At this juncture, I'm OK with expending the effort myself to keep
guile-1.8 working with lilypond as the sole reverse dependency if that's
what is required. [Unfortunately,
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes:
At this juncture, I'm OK with expending the effort myself to keep
guile-1.8 working with lilypond as the sole reverse dependency if that's
what is required. [Unfortunately, I don't have enough time or expertise
to actually solve the issues with the
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/04/15 14:29, Don Armstrong wrote:
Upstream has been working on porting, but there are some serious
issues with guile 2.0 which have not yet been resolved. I agree that
this should be fixed before stretch, but I don't think that
On 29/04/15 14:29, Don Armstrong wrote:
On April 29, 2015 2:52:53 AM CDT, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org
wrote:
So guile-1.8 got into jessie just for lilypond. I'm going to remove
both from
testing now - there should be plenty of time to get lilypond ported to
guile-2.0
and back
Control: severity -1 serious
On 21/09/14 23:05, Rob Browning wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes:
What are your thoughts about supporting guile 1.8 for another release?
I'd likely prefer that to dropping lilypond, so no worries. Let's see
where we end up.
If you can,
On April 29, 2015 2:52:53 AM CDT, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org
wrote:
So guile-1.8 got into jessie just for lilypond. I'm going to remove
both from
testing now - there should be plenty of time to get lilypond ported to
guile-2.0
and back into testing for the Stretch release.
Cheers,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Rob Browning wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes:
Should have guessed as much. Upstream probably just doesn't use it. Thanks!
Certainly -- shout if I can help with anything else.
I finally got back into trying to make guile 2.0 work, and apparently
there
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes:
What are your thoughts about supporting guile 1.8 for another release?
I'd likely prefer that to dropping lilypond, so no worries. Let's see
where we end up.
If you can, keep an eye on any critical deadlines and ping me if needed
(i.e. if I need to
Currently guile-2.0-dev installs to /usr/include/guile/2.0, which makes
the migration more difficult than merely switching guile-1.8-dev for
guile-2.0-dev... is this the way it's going to stay?
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
There is no more concentrated form
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes:
Currently guile-2.0-dev installs to /usr/include/guile/2.0, which makes
the migration more difficult than merely switching guile-1.8-dev for
guile-2.0-dev... is this the way it's going to stay?
Would guile-config compile help? (And there's also a
On September 12, 2014 8:17:09 PM PDT, Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org
wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes:
Currently guile-2.0-dev installs to /usr/include/guile/2.0, which
makes
the migration more difficult than merely switching guile-1.8-dev for
guile-2.0-dev... is this the
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes:
Should have guessed as much. Upstream probably just doesn't use it. Thanks!
Certainly -- shout if I can help with anything else.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B
17 matches
Mail list logo