(seems like I didn't actually CC linux-sunxi when I said I would, oh
well, I may post a summary to that list later)
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 19:44 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
Unfortunately the problematic part in this case is the SPL which
is the only part of u-boot that cannot be relocated
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 08:43 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I suppose it is possible that something somewhere is wanting to zero the
GPT even in msdos mode (as you say below, perhaps to wipe any remains of
a GPT).
I think it is parted doing this in ped_disk_clobber which is called from
various bits
CCing the linux-sunxi group.
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 17:58 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 08:02:03PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
Source: partman-base
Version: 173
Severity: important
Upon testing a locally built debian-installer based on linux
3.15-1 (from
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
CCing the linux-sunxi group.
It sure would be nice if CPU makers would stop putting their boot code
where the GPT goes. Do none of them EVER think their device will want
to use a disk bigger than 2TB?
Hrm, that is rather
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 07:44:36PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
Unfortunately the problematic part in this case is the SPL which
is the only part of u-boot that cannot be relocated because its
sector address is hardcoded in the SOC's BROM.
I see two possible approaches to solve the conflict
5 matches
Mail list logo
