Bug#759688: ufoai

2014-09-20 Thread Tobias Frost
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 00:25 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: On 19.09.2014 21:44, Tobias Frost wrote: [...] The three data packages are all part of the same game and they had to be split because of size and functional reasons but they wouldn't make sense without the ufoai source package.

Bug#759688: ufoai

2014-09-19 Thread Markus Koschany
On 19.09.2014 07:32, Tobias Frost wrote: Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 pending I'll try to review these packages over the weekend. (the package looks huge :) Hi Tobi! Thank you for your interest in UFO:AI. Indeed it's one of the more complex and bigger games. :) (First thing that

Bug#759688: ufoai

2014-09-19 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: block -1 by 762228 On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 11:37 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: On 19.09.2014 07:32, Tobias Frost wrote: Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 pending I'll try to review these packages over the weekend. (the package looks huge :) Hi Tobi! Thank you for your

Bug#759688: ufoai

2014-09-19 Thread Markus Koschany
On 19.09.2014 21:44, Tobias Frost wrote: [...] The three data packages are all part of the same game and they had to be split because of size and functional reasons but they wouldn't make sense without the ufoai source package. Well the lintian message says split of an *existing* Debian

Bug#759688: ufoai

2014-09-18 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 pending I'll try to review these packages over the weekend. (the package looks huge :) (First thing that I saw -- but I don't know how's the best practice in pkg-games, so maybe this is more a question to the list: There is only one ITP filed, but three