On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 00:25 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
On 19.09.2014 21:44, Tobias Frost wrote:
[...]
The three data packages are all part of the same game and they had to be
split because of size and functional reasons but they wouldn't make
sense without the ufoai source package.
On 19.09.2014 07:32, Tobias Frost wrote:
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
I'll try to review these packages over the weekend.
(the package looks huge :)
Hi Tobi!
Thank you for your interest in UFO:AI. Indeed it's one of the more
complex and bigger games. :)
(First thing that
Control: block -1 by 762228
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 11:37 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
On 19.09.2014 07:32, Tobias Frost wrote:
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
I'll try to review these packages over the weekend.
(the package looks huge :)
Hi Tobi!
Thank you for your
On 19.09.2014 21:44, Tobias Frost wrote:
[...]
The three data packages are all part of the same game and they had to be
split because of size and functional reasons but they wouldn't make
sense without the ufoai source package.
Well the lintian message says split of an *existing* Debian
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
I'll try to review these packages over the weekend.
(the package looks huge :)
(First thing that I saw -- but I don't know how's the best practice
in pkg-games, so maybe this is more a question to the list:
There is only one ITP filed, but three
5 matches
Mail list logo