Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2017-02-18 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Ansgar Burchardt writes: >> This case is the same as when we deal with a convenience copy of a >> library that ships with a program: you don't need to remove the >> convenience copy, but you do need to ensure it isn't used. > > If the convenience copy comes without source, it should be removed as

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2017-02-18 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
severity 760414 serious thanks Wouter Verhelst writes: > First of all, I wouldn't call minified javascript a "binary". I agree > that it's not source, but that doesn't imply it's a binary (that is > orthogonal to my point, but I want to point that out). We misuse "binary" a bit in this context

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2014-11-23 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:08:38PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: On November 22, 2014 5:57:56 AM EST, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:12:53AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: Your analysis is rather different than that of the FTP Team. See

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2014-11-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 23, 2014 7:18:04 AM EST, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:08:38PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: On November 22, 2014 5:57:56 AM EST, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:12:53AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: Your

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2014-11-22 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:12:53AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: Your analysis is rather different than that of the FTP Team. See https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1948618.u6YZvnFvaf@scott-latitude-e6320 Please readjust the severity back to serious. That is the correct value. I have

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2014-11-22 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: I have explained my opinion in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/05/msg00191.html: the source *is* in Debian, just in a different source package. The actual code, used by the package when installed, is used from that

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2014-11-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 22, 2014 5:57:56 AM EST, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:12:53AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: Your analysis is rather different than that of the FTP Team. See https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1948618.u6YZvnFvaf@scott-latitude-e6320

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2014-11-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:18:30 +0200 Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote: severity 760414 wishlist tags 760414 + wontfix thanks Hi Bastien, On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:24:44PM +, bastien ROUCARIES wrote: Hi, Your package seems to include some files that lack sources in

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2014-09-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
severity 760414 wishlist tags 760414 + wontfix thanks Hi Bastien, On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:24:44PM +, bastien ROUCARIES wrote: Hi, Your package seems to include some files that lack sources in prefered forms of modification: tools/rdm/static/jquery-1.7.2.min.js

Bug#760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package

2014-09-03 Thread bastien ROUCARIES
Package: ola Version: 0.9.1-1 user: lintian-ma...@debian.org usertags: source-is-missing severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org Hi, Your package seems to include some files that lack sources in prefered forms of modification: tools/rdm/static/jquery-1.7.2.min.js