Bug#766185: support of different Freeciv clients

2014-11-23 Thread Jacob Nevins
This sounds like a good plan to me. Markus Koschany writes: 1. The virtual package freeciv should be dropped and be replaced with a metapackage. [...] 2. The metapackage freeciv should always depend on the recommended and most sophisticated Freeciv client which is currently

Bug#766185: support of different Freeciv clients

2014-11-23 Thread Markus Koschany
On 23.11.2014 14:40, Jacob Nevins wrote: This sounds like a good plan to me. Markus Koschany writes: 1. The virtual package freeciv should be dropped and be replaced with a metapackage. [...] 2. The metapackage freeciv should always depend on the recommended and most sophisticated

Bug#766185: support of different Freeciv clients

2014-11-17 Thread Markus Koschany
retitle 766185 support of different Freeciv clients thanks Here is the current plan for Freeciv 2.5: 1. The virtual package freeciv should be dropped and be replaced with a metapackage. Actually freeciv is not even part of this authoritative list of virtual packages and I think using a