This sounds like a good plan to me.
Markus Koschany writes:
1. The virtual package freeciv should be dropped and be replaced with
a metapackage. [...]
2. The metapackage freeciv should always depend on the recommended and
most sophisticated Freeciv client which is currently
On 23.11.2014 14:40, Jacob Nevins wrote:
This sounds like a good plan to me.
Markus Koschany writes:
1. The virtual package freeciv should be dropped and be replaced with
a metapackage. [...]
2. The metapackage freeciv should always depend on the recommended and
most sophisticated
retitle 766185 support of different Freeciv clients
thanks
Here is the current plan for Freeciv 2.5:
1. The virtual package freeciv should be dropped and be replaced with
a metapackage. Actually freeciv is not even part of this
authoritative list of virtual packages and I think using a
3 matches
Mail list logo