On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, Charles Cazabon wrote:
I hope Debian can simply accept the newer version of getmail; as I said, I try
The next stable version of Debian (aka jessie) has getmail 4.46.0.
We also have an official backports archive, and it will also have getmail
4.46.0 in a few days. This
Hi,
Thanks for your comment. (Charles is the upstream,)
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 01:30:41PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
In Debian, its security update policy prohibits any new feature added
with security updates.
It's kind of a bogus distinction.
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 01:30:41PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
As Linus Torvalds says, there's no real difference between bugfix and
security fix, and I would argue there's almost as little difference
between bugfix and new feature.
If you added an
(resent after subscribing with proper return path mail address)
Hi,
In Debian, its security update policy prohibits any new feature added
with security updates.
There are needs for updating 4.32.0 and 4.20.0 for the MITM security
issues.
CVE-2014-7273
CVE-2014-7274
CVE-2014-7275
I for one
Hi,
In Debian, its security update policy prohibits any new feature added
with security updates.
There are needs for updating 4.32.0 and 4.20.0 for the MITM security
issues.
CVE-2014-7273
CVE-2014-7274
CVE-2014-7275
I for one as being its maintainer in Debian see it possible but
am scared
5 matches
Mail list logo