Bug#766812: spurious library link

2016-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 04, Marco d'Itri wrote: > The attached patch solves this problem by creating the link in postinst > and only if it is needed. I have not heard back from you, what are your plans about fixing this? I do not mind doing a NMU, if you prefer. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc

Bug#766812: spurious library link

2016-01-03 Thread Marco d'Itri
reassign 766812 musl-dev found 766812 1.1.5-1 tag 766812 patch thanks On Mar 31, Kevin Bortis wrote: > The link is needed for various tools that expect a link or the real > libc.so be available in the same location as the includes and other > resources. One prominent member is

Bug#766812: spurious library link

2015-03-31 Thread Kevin Bortis
The link is needed for various tools that expect a link or the real libc.so be available in the same location as the includes and other resources. One prominent member is musl-gcc from the musl-tools package, which would fail to dynamic link to the correct libc.so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#766812: spurious library link

2014-10-25 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: musl-dev Version: 1.1.5-1 Severity: normal This link does not appear to have any purpose and should be removed: /usr/lib/i386-linux-musl/libc.so - /lib/i386-linux-musl/libc.so -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature