On Jan 04, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> The attached patch solves this problem by creating the link in postinst
> and only if it is needed.
I have not heard back from you, what are your plans about fixing this?
I do not mind doing a NMU, if you prefer.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
reassign 766812 musl-dev
found 766812 1.1.5-1
tag 766812 patch
thanks
On Mar 31, Kevin Bortis wrote:
> The link is needed for various tools that expect a link or the real
> libc.so be available in the same location as the includes and other
> resources. One prominent member is
The link is needed for various tools that expect a link or the real
libc.so be available in the same location as the includes and other
resources. One prominent member is musl-gcc from the musl-tools
package, which would fail to dynamic link to the correct libc.so.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: musl-dev
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: normal
This link does not appear to have any purpose and should be removed:
/usr/lib/i386-linux-musl/libc.so - /lib/i386-linux-musl/libc.so
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
4 matches
Mail list logo