On 10/11/14 22:41, Charles Plessy wrote:
For the avoidance of doubt, I have also counted the numbers for other CC
licenses; here is the result.
...
CC-BY 1.011
CC-BY 2.0 1
CC-BY 2.533
CC-BY 3.0 311
CC-BY-SA 1.0 2
Le Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 09:13:21AM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
How about adding both MPLs to /usr/share/common-licenses ?
Given those numbers, I think we should. And possibly also CC-BY-SA 3.0
while we're at it.
Hi Russ,
I fully agree.
For the avoidance of doubt, I have also counted
Le Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:21:58AM +0900, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Note the iceweasel copyright file uses that stanza for both MPL-1.1 and
MPL-2.0, and is still about 100K long. Even if MPL-2.0 ends up in the
common set of licenses, that would still leave the MPL-1.1 being a
problem, while, in
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
here is the current license count that I just calculated on the lintian
lab (lilburn.debian.org) using tools/licence-count from the Policy's Git
repository.
[...]
MPL 1.11146
MPL 2.0 853
I think that's a lot higher
4 matches
Mail list logo
