On Mi, 26 ian 22, 20:30:37, de...@sumpfralle.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> given the recent CVE-2021-4034 (gaining local root access via "policykit-1"),
> I
> would like to raise this request again: it would be great, if the
> libvirt-daemon-system package would reduce its hard dependency ("Depends")
Hello,
given the recent CVE-2021-4034 (gaining local root access via "policykit-1"), I
would like to raise this request again: it would be great, if the
libvirt-daemon-system package would reduce its hard dependency ("Depends") on
"policykit-1" to a soft dependency ("Recommends").
If I
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:45:43PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Hi all, hi Guido!
I just wanted to throw in my 2c. While cleaning up some machines, I
came along my KVM host and actually wondered why policykit was pulled
in. I'm as well only using root-based access to libvirt, which
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 08:46:42 +0100
Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org wrote:
Having polkit installed and doing nothing (for people switching to
socke based permission checks) is IMHO a better service to our users
than having all the bugs for people installing without recommends (and
there are many
Hi.
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 21:17:34 +0100
Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org wrote:
Thanks for the path but we have this in libvirt-daemon-system.NEWS
already - and that's the package that depends on systemd. We rather
need an update to README.Debian of libvirt-daemon-system explaining
how to
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 01:21:04AM +0300, Reco wrote:
Package: libvirt-daemon-system
Version: 1.2.9-3~bpo70+1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
A recent upload of backported libvirt packages introduced policykit-1
hard dependency on libvirt-daemon-system package.
Such dependency is
6 matches
Mail list logo
