Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-07-14 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/hiredis.html Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org (2015-07-13): On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Seeing as that's been open for nearly a month now with no response, and webdis has no reverse dependencies, let's go

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-07-14 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org (2015-06-11): On 2015-05-16 20:38, Tom Lee wrote: Control: block -1 by 785476 Bug raised against webdis: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785476 [2] Seeing as that's been open for nearly a month now with no response, and webdis has no

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-07-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Seeing as that's been open for nearly a month now with no response, and webdis has no reverse dependencies, let's go ahead with the transition and break webdis at the end if required. Please upload to unstable. This transition has been

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-06-11 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed On 2015-05-16 20:38, Tom Lee wrote: Control: block -1 by 785476 Bug raised against webdis: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785476 [2] Seeing as that's been open for nearly a month now with no response, and webdis has no reverse dependencies, let's

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-05-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On 2015-05-16 12:23, Tom Lee wrote: Confirmed the webdis segfault is due to an ABI change. That'll need sorting out before the transition begins please. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-05-16 Thread Tom Lee
I'm assuming this doesn't change anything with respect to the transition, but upon further investigation in gdb the segfault actually seems to be a packaging issue with webdis. Seems like upstream webdis vendors hiredis and jansson. In the Debian packaging we're correctly trying to use the .so,

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-05-16 Thread Tom Lee
Control: block -1 by 785476 Bug raised against webdis: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785476 On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Tom Lee deb...@tomlee.co wrote: I'm assuming this doesn't change anything with respect to the transition, but upon further investigation in gdb the

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-05-16 Thread Tom Lee
Confirmed the webdis segfault is due to an ABI change. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Tom Lee deb...@tomlee.co wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 15/05/15 06:10, Tom Lee wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-05-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/05/15 06:10, Tom Lee wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, I'd like to request a transition slot from the release team. The libhiredis SONAME changed in the latest release from upstream,

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-05-15 Thread Tom Lee
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 15/05/15 06:10, Tom Lee wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, I'd like to request a transition slot from the

Bug#785349: transition: hiredis

2015-05-14 Thread Tom Lee
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, I'd like to request a transition slot from the release team. The libhiredis SONAME changed in the latest release from upstream, indicating ABI-incompatible changes to the