On 04/06/15 17:27, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
onsdagen den 3 juni 2015 20.04.29 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 03/06/15 11:00, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Also please don't forget haskell-hopenpgp-tools.
I did them. haskell-hopenpgp-tools and aria2 look bad.
Haskell may be a bit of a hassle but
onsdagen den 3 juni 2015 20.04.29 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 03/06/15 11:00, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Also please don't forget haskell-hopenpgp-tools.
I did them. haskell-hopenpgp-tools and aria2 look bad.
Haskell may be a bit of a hassle but aria2 we can always temporarily patch not
tisdagen den 2 juni 2015 10.08.56 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
We can start with the binNMUs soon.
None of the other dependencies depend on the haskell packages, so I think you
can go on with level 3.
Also please don't forget haskell-hopenpgp-tools.
--
Magnus Holmgren
Debian Developer
--
On 03/06/15 11:00, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
tisdagen den 2 juni 2015 10.08.56 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
We can start with the binNMUs soon.
None of the other dependencies depend on the haskell packages, so I think you
can go on with level 3.
Also please don't forget
On 02/06/15 08:53, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Well that didn't appear to go so well on arm64 after all... could you look
at the build log and check the version of gcc was correct please?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nettlearch=arm64ver=3.1.1-3stamp=1433198670
I've given it
Well that didn't appear to go so well on arm64 after all... could you look
at the build log and check the version of gcc was correct please?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nettlearch=arm64ver=3.1.1-3stamp=1433198670
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
On 02/06/15 11:47, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
tisdagen den 2 juni 2015 10.08.56 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 02/06/15 08:53, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Well that didn't appear to go so well on arm64 after all... could you look
at the build log and check the version of gcc was correct please?
tisdagen den 2 juni 2015 10.08.56 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 02/06/15 08:53, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Well that didn't appear to go so well on arm64 after all... could you look
at the build log and check the version of gcc was correct please?
fredagen den 15 maj 2015 16.09.20 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 15/05/15 14:43, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
version 3.1.1) that I'd like to upload to unstable.
Please fix the nettle arm64 build in experimental first.
Control: tag -1 confirmed - moreinfo
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:26:11PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
fredagen den 15 maj 2015 16.09.20 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 15/05/15 14:43, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 14:43:51 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
version 3.1.1) that I'd like to upload to unstable.
I've tried building all depending packages found on
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
version 3.1.1) that I'd like to upload to unstable.
I've tried building all depending packages found on
fredagen den 15 maj 2015 16.09.20 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
Please fix the nettle arm64 build in experimental first.
Naturally, as soon as I get a porterbox rolling; asachi is unreachable and my
sudo password takes a long time to propagate to turfan.
--
Magnus Holmgren
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 15/05/15 14:43, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
version 3.1.1) that I'd like to
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 16:16:25 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Fri 15 May 2015 15.53.43, Julien Cristau wrote:
Why does nettle not version its symbols? For such a low level library
(especially one that seems to break its ABI regularly) that seems like a
fairly major oversight.
It
On Fri 15 May 2015 15.53.43, Julien Cristau wrote:
Why does nettle not version its symbols? For such a low level library
(especially one that seems to break its ABI regularly) that seems like a
fairly major oversight.
It does now, albeit perhaps not quite properly. (I have tried to explain to
16 matches
Mail list logo
