Bug#785796: Bug#784728: util-linux: FTBFS on kfreebsd where F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC is not defined

2015-05-23 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 22/05/2015 23:23, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : Hi, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le 20/05/2015 11:31, Andreas Henriksson a écrit : I'm under the impression kfreebsd is no longer a blocker for testing migration, but I might be mistaken. [...] You might be right. I thought it would block

Bug#785796: Bug#784728: util-linux: FTBFS on kfreebsd where F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC is not defined

2015-05-22 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le 20/05/2015 11:31, Andreas Henriksson a écrit : I'm under the impression kfreebsd is no longer a blocker for testing migration, but I might be mistaken. [...] You might be right. I thought it would block transition because it appears with the release arch

Bug#785796: Bug#784728: util-linux: FTBFS on kfreebsd where F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC is not defined

2015-05-20 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 20/05/2015 11:31, Andreas Henriksson a écrit : I'm under the impression kfreebsd is no longer a blocker for testing migration, but I might be mistaken. AFAIK kfreebsd was never a release arch, just a tech preview for wheezy but no longer so for jessie. I'll double-check this with the

Bug#785796: Bug#784728: util-linux: FTBFS on kfreebsd where F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC is not defined

2015-05-20 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Thibaut Paumard. Please note that I cloned the bug report so it now has a new number. (CC adjusted.) On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Dear Andreas, [...] I'm not perticularly interested in the kfreebsd ports, thanks. However, Me neither... Thanks again