Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2022-05-29 Thread Christoph Biedl
Control: tags 789694 moreinfo Gabriele Giacone wrote... > attached patch makes schroot working on hurd, has been being tested on > exodar porterbox since many months. > It works around #763932 bug. > > More info in threads at > https://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2014/09/msg00058.html >

Bug#789694: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2016-02-15 Thread Roger Leigh
On 15/02/2016 22:31, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Samuel Thibault, on Thu 30 Jul 2015 20:34:49 +0200, wrote: Roger Leigh, le Sun 26 Jul 2015 16:26:22 +, a écrit : Regarding Samuel's commit to the alioth master branch: this is no longer the canonical upstream repo for schroot, Aow, ok.

Bug#789694: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2016-02-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Samuel Thibault, on Thu 30 Jul 2015 20:34:49 +0200, wrote: > Roger Leigh, le Sun 26 Jul 2015 16:26:22 +, a écrit : > > Regarding Samuel's commit to the alioth master branch: this is no longer the > > canonical upstream repo for schroot, > > Aow, ok. > > > If you're happy with both of

Bug#789694: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2015-07-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Roger Leigh, le Sun 26 Jul 2015 16:26:22 +, a écrit : Regarding Samuel's commit to the alioth master branch: this is no longer the canonical upstream repo for schroot, Aow, ok. If you're happy with both of the above pull requests, I'll merge them and make a new 1.6 release. Yes, please.

Bug#789694: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2015-07-26 Thread Roger Leigh
On 23/06/2015 13:42, Gabriele Giacone wrote: attached patch makes schroot working on hurd, has been being tested on exodar porterbox since many months. It works around #763932 bug. Dear Gabriele and Samuel, I just want to check on the state of this patch and add a few notes. I'm not

Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2015-07-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 09 Jul 2015 10:45:04 +0200, a écrit : Notably I don't think debootstrap uses a passive translator, and thus I don't see why the second do_umount_all shouldn't be able to umount $CHROOT/proc actually. I have thus commited everything but that explicit settrans, which I

Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2015-07-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 23 Jun 2015 15:42:52 +0200, a écrit : More info in threads at https://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2014/09/msg00058.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2015/05/msg00063.html We also need a summary, because there is a lot of information spread across the whole

Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2015-07-09 Thread Gabriele Giacone
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote: - debootstrap sets up a passive (i.e. permanent) bind mount from /proc to $CHROOT/proc debootstrap in hurd case just runs setup-translators -K, which sets another passive /proc under chroot, and it bindmounts /dev and

Bug#789694: schroot: Please consider patch to fix it on hurd-i386

2015-06-23 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Package: schroot Version: 1.6.10-1+b1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Dear maintainer, attached patch makes schroot working on hurd, has been being tested on exodar porterbox since many months. It works around #763932 bug. More info in threads at