Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

2015-12-14 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:58AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves writes: > > > From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including > > libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2 would not > > depend on redhat-cluster and it

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

2015-12-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 14/12/15 11:10, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:58AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> Dominic Hargreaves writes: >> >>> From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including >>> libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

2015-12-14 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:15:03 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Dominic Hargreaves writes: > >>> If not then perhaps that should just be dropped from the > >>> redhat-cluster package ASAP [...] -- of course, since redhat-cluster > >>> FTBFS, this would have to be done by

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

2015-12-13 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Dominic Hargreaves writes: > From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including > libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2 would not > depend on redhat-cluster and it could be removed from testing? Yes, that's the plan. > As a more