On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:58AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Dominic Hargreaves writes:
>
> > From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including
> > libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2 would not
> > depend on redhat-cluster and it
On 14/12/15 11:10, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:58AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> Dominic Hargreaves writes:
>>
>>> From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including
>>> libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:15:03 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> Dominic Hargreaves writes:
> >>> If not then perhaps that should just be dropped from the
> >>> redhat-cluster package ASAP [...] -- of course, since redhat-cluster
> >>> FTBFS, this would have to be done by
Dominic Hargreaves writes:
> From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including
> libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2 would not
> depend on redhat-cluster and it could be removed from testing?
Yes, that's the plan.
> As a more
4 matches
Mail list logo