Bug#796345: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2016-01-03 Thread Jo Shields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 31/12/15 20:33, Jo Shields wrote: > > > On 31/12/15 18:48, Julien Cristau wrote: >> 3 packages from the mono-tools source break due to a dep on >> libmono-cecil-private-cil (<< 3.2.9): gendarme, mono-tools-devel, >> mono-tools-gui. AFAICT

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 19:11:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 02:55:53 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > Last britney run had this: > > > > * amd64: ganglia-nagios-bridge, gendarme, icinga, icinga-core, > > icinga-dbg, > > kde-full, kdepim, kleopatra,

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 02:55:53 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/12/15 21:06, Niko Tyni wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> We're almost there. The last britney run reported: > >> > >> * ppc64el: cyrus-dev, libccs-perl,

Bug#796345: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-31 Thread Jo Shields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 31/12/15 18:48, Julien Cristau wrote: > 3 packages from the mono-tools source break due to a dep on > libmono-cecil-private-cil (<< 3.2.9): gendarme, mono-tools-devel, > mono-tools-gui. AFAICT that needs a sourceful upload of > mono-tools. >

Bug#796345: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-31 Thread Jo Shields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 31/12/15 18:48, Julien Cristau wrote: > On the mono side I end up with remove > nrefactory/5.3.0+20130718.73b6d0f-2 > mono-debugger-libs/0+20131201.3459502-1 sdb/1.2-1 Just pushed a fix for this to Sid -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-30 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > We're almost there. The last britney run reported: > > * ppc64el: cyrus-dev, libccs-perl, libcyrus-imap-perl, libdcmtk4-dev, > libperl5.20, libvtkgdcm-java, libvtkgdcm2.4, linux-perf-4.2, oar-restful-api Awesome,

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/12/15 21:06, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> We're almost there. The last britney run reported: >> >> * ppc64el: cyrus-dev, libccs-perl, libcyrus-imap-perl, libdcmtk4-dev, >> libperl5.20, libvtkgdcm-java, libvtkgdcm2.4,

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
We're almost there. The last britney run reported: * ppc64el: cyrus-dev, libccs-perl, libcyrus-imap-perl, libdcmtk4-dev, libperl5.20, libvtkgdcm-java, libvtkgdcm2.4, linux-perf-4.2, oar-restful-api Of those: libdcmtk4-dev, libperl5.20, libvtkgdcm-java, libvtkgdcm2.4, linux-perf-4.2 are

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-30 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > We're almost there. The last britney run reported: > > * ppc64el: cyrus-dev, libccs-perl, libcyrus-imap-perl, libdcmtk4-dev, > libperl5.20, libvtkgdcm-java, libvtkgdcm2.4, linux-perf-4.2, oar-restful-api > > Of those:

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-13 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 11:10:54PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Niko has uploaded 5.22.1-RC3 to experimental and we should see > 5.22.1 final in a few days. > > I'm rebuilding all the packages involved in the perlapi transition > against 5.22.1, and spotted a couple of issues which I've

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-13 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:43:07PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 11:10:54PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Niko has uploaded 5.22.1-RC3 to experimental and we should see > > 5.22.1 final in a few days. > > > > I'm rebuilding all the packages involved in the

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 13/12/15 13:43, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > As I already mentioned, redhat-cluster currently FTBFS, and has done > since August, so I don't think we should block on that. We can't remove it from testing as lvm2 depends on it, so this really is a blocker. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-06 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:22:13PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 03/12/15 13:15, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >>> I've tested the

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-03 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 02/12/15 17:48, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Emilio Pozuelo

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-03 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 03/12/15 13:15, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 02/12/15 17:48, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/12/15 17:48, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > That'd only

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-02 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > > That'd only leave us with the apache bug. > > > > > >

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-02 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Dominic Hargreaves, 02.12.2015 16:48:39 + |=- > I will try some real world testing with the new libapache2-mod-perl2 > package in sid/perl 5.20 later this week, and then I think we can plan > to go ahead with the transition after that - as soon as this weekend > if other ongoing

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-02 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > That'd only leave us with the apache bug. > > > > There's a patch available for that now, right? > > Yes. It has been included in the

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > That'd only leave us with the apache bug. There's a patch available for that now, right? Emilio

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-12-01 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > That'd only leave us with the apache bug. > > There's a patch available for that now, right? Yes. It has been included in the upload to experimental 1.5 days ago:

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-10-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:00:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> That'd only leave us with the apache bug. > > Ack, that's my impression as well. > What about libtest-refcount-perl ? Does it have to build-depend on the > RC-buggy > libdevel-findref-perl ? Nope its' optional. Fixed version

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-10-30 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote (30 Oct 2015 13:34:21 GMT) : > #787446 - libdevel-findref-perl: has one rdep and one build-rdep: > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Depends: > libtest-bdd-cucumber-perl: libtest-bdd-cucumber-perl > # Broken Build-Depends: > libtest-bdd-cucumber-perl:

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-10-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
So of the blockers: #787912 - can be removed together with its one rdep, not a blocker #787499 - can be removed together with its one rdep, not a blocker #787493 - libapache-mod-perl: blocker #787446 - libdevel-findref-perl: has one rdep and one build-rdep: Checking reverse dependencies... #

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-10-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/10/15 02:22, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I want to finish python 3.5 and ruby 2.2. After that, it could happen at any > time I think (I have to look if the packages affected by the libstdc++ > transition have been renamed). Doesn't look like there are any remaining conflicts with the

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-10-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:34:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > #787493 - libapache-mod-perl: blocker There's recent work on a patch in the upstream bug: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=101962 I'm optimistic this will be sorted out soon. > That'd only leave us with the

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-10-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/10/15 18:59, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:34:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> #787493 - libapache-mod-perl: blocker > > There's recent work on a patch in the upstream bug: > https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=101962 Yeah I saw that. > I'm

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-09-30 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Hello all, Here is a quick update on progress since my last update on 7th Sept: The current stats for this transition are as follows: * Number of binNMUs needed: 570[1] (was 571) * Number of arch:any packages which FTBFS with perl 5.22: 7 (was 8) * 1 fix pending; 6 needing more work or

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

2015-09-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/09/15 23:27, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Hello all, > > Here is a quick update on progress since my last update on 7th Sept: Thanks. > Release team: can we upgrade the FTBFS bugs to RC now so they get > a bit more attention Yes. > and do you have a feeling for when you might > be ready