Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

Re: Ferenc Wagner 2015-12-22 <874mfbfh6y@lant.ki.iif.hu> > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > > > This is the last blocker for the perl transition. Packages should be > > installable now in unstable. Please let us know if you make progress > > with this or if you hit any

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > This is the last blocker for the perl transition. Packages should be > installable now in unstable. Please let us know if you make progress > with this or if you hit any blockers. Short progress report: no blockers. I encountered unexpected

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On 17/12/15 14:09, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ferenc Wagner writes: > >> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: >> >>> On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >>> Niko Tyni writes: > So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On 17/12/15 14:09, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ferenc Wagner writes: > >> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: >> >>> On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >>> Niko Tyni writes: > So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Niko Tyni writes: >> >>> So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source package, as >>> discussed in [1]. Ferenc, do I understand right that a new pacemaker >>> package

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

Ferenc Wagner writes: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > >> On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> >>> Niko Tyni writes: >>> So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source package, as discussed in [1]. Ferenc, do I

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

Niko Tyni writes: > So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source package, as > discussed in [1]. Ferenc, do I understand right that a new pacemaker > package is a blocker for this? Is that because the current pacemaker > would be broken by the libdlm update? No:

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Niko Tyni writes: > >> So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source package, as >> discussed in [1]. Ferenc, do I understand right that a new pacemaker >> package is a blocker for this? Is that because the current

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 15/12/15 21:27, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:26:34PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:15:03 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> > Dominic Hargreaves writes: >> >> If not then perhaps that should just

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:26:34PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:15:03 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > >> Dominic Hargreaves writes: > > > >>> If not then perhaps that should just be dropped from the > > >>> redhat-cluster package ASAP [...] --

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

Hi Ferenc On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:12:18AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > No: the new DLM package depends on the new Pacemaker package. I'm > already testing them, there's only some cleanup remaining before they > can be uploaded. Can you give an ETA? Otherwise I'm inclined to remove cluster

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

[adding redhat-cluster and lvm maintainers to thread. This discussion is about trying to start the perl 5.22 transition, which has been 'about to happen' since August - so obviously those of us who care about that are quite keen to see it happen sooner rather than later] [take two with fixed

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

[adding redhat-cluster and lvm maintainers to thread. This discussion is about trying to start the perl 5.22 transition, which has been 'about to happen' since August - so obviously those of us who care about that are quite keen to see it happen sooner rather than later] On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:56:41PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > [adding redhat-cluster and lvm maintainers to thread. This discussion > is about trying to start the perl 5.22 transition, which has been > 'about to happen' since August - so obviously those of us who care > about that are