Hi,
the problem was a spelling mistake in the symbol file for the qt5 build.
Now building and using of this package works fine.
Kind regards,
Stefan
Hi,
I'm wrong. There is a error in the dependencies. I've built the tomahawk
package successful, but I'm unable to install it because the package is
looking for a dependencies called libquazip15 instead of libquazip5-1. I
really do not know what's wrong, the control files of libquazip and
Hi Stefan,
thanks for your work on this.
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:51:59PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I've updated the debian files and I decided to use quazip 0.7.1 and
> patch the CMakeLists.text files instead of using a development release.
Fine.
> Furthermore, I was
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:16:49PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> > While I would have prefered to fix all bugs inside the package it is
> > fine for me to care for the obviously more urgent problem first.
>
> I think, we should close this bug report as "won't be
Hi Andreas,
I've updated the debian files and I decided to use quazip 0.7.1 and
patch the CMakeLists.text files instead of using a development release.
Furthermore, I was not able to install the FindQuaZip.cmake file,
because it is not allowed to ship a "Find module". (lintian error:
Hi Andreas,
> Either this or we use common VCS. Please tick-mark your prefered option
>
> [ ] I'll add you to Debian Med team and you commit to SVN
> [ ] I'll add you to Debian Med team and migrate the package to Git
> [ ] I move the package to collab-maint Git
> [ ] I move the package
Hi Andreas,
> I added the patch from SVN as quilt patch[1] and tried to trigger this
> in debian/rules[2] - but the latter has no effect.
It looks like there are more than one changes on the CMake file since
the last release. Sorry for that confusion.
> I also have no idea where to install
Hi Stefan,
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 12:24:37PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> It looks like there are more than one changes on the CMake file since
> the last release. Sorry for that confusion.
No problem.
> > I also have no idea where to install theses cmake files.
>
> By using CMake instead
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 01:36:22PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> I think the best way would be:
>
> [X] I'll add you to Debian Med team and migrate the package to Git
>
> But I'm not so familiar with using VCS. I would be very happy if you
> could supports me.
Do you have an login at
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 01:36:22PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> I think the best way would be:
>
> [X] I'll add you to Debian Med team and migrate the package to Git
Migrated to
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/libquazip.git
> But I'm not so familiar with using VCS. I would be very
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> have you any new infos?
>
> Maybe this patch could be helpful:
> http://sourceforge.net/p/quazip/code/257/
> This patch adds the possibility to use a Qt version suffix by using
> cmake and it could also be helpful for
Hi,
have you any new infos?
Maybe this patch could be helpful:
http://sourceforge.net/p/quazip/code/257/
This patch adds the possibility to use a Qt version suffix by using
cmake and it could also be helpful for #778768 to provide different
cmake files for the Qt4 and Qt5 build.
Kind regards,
Package: libquazip-qt5-dev
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: minor
Dear maintainers,
please change the Qt5 suffix from libquazip-qt5.so to libquazip5.so
The other distributions uses this suffix, too. For example fedora:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/quazip-qt5-devel/
And so some apps like
Hi Eric,
could you care for this problem. There is also a new upstream version
that could be packaged when solving this. Please let me know if you
might have any time constraints.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 03:36:13PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> Package:
14 matches
Mail list logo
