Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On jeu., 2016-03-17 at 14:22 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> But as mentioned above, I think six months
>> updates may be enough for advanced users. You get new features while
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On jeu., 2016-03-17 at 10:20 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> It seems linux-grsec will remain i386 and amd64 only.
>
> There's no reason to, actually. It's just that right now I don't have a way to
> test on
Hi,
On jeu., 2016-03-17 at 10:20 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> It seems linux-grsec will remain i386 and amd64 only.
There's no reason to, actually. It's just that right now I don't have a way to
test on other architectures, so I prefer keeping it that way. But if someone
steps to to
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I'm reporting against linux-patch-grsecurity2 package but actually I
> think it should be reassigned to ftp.debian.org soon. This package is
> severely obsolete, and is somehow deprecated by the fact that a
>
On jeu., 2016-03-17 at 14:22 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > Well, uploading new Linux major version to stable looks indeed not
> trivial,
> > (thus my filing of #810506), but ultimately it's the RT's call.
> I mean can you remain in sync with kernel updates (security updates
> only)
Source: linux-patch-grsecurity2
Severity: important
Hi,
I'm reporting against linux-patch-grsecurity2 package but actually I
think it should be reassigned to ftp.debian.org soon. This package is
severely obsolete, and is somehow deprecated by the fact that a
linux-grsec source package now
6 matches
Mail list logo