Bug#812602: don't recommend a specific python3.x version

2016-01-25 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:00:45PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > btw, why the +dfsg+dfsg in the version? It somehow slipped in when I imported the new upstream release, and then I uploaded it without noticing. Of course I realized something was off once it was too late for changing it back...

Bug#812602: don't recommend a specific python3.x version

2016-01-25 Thread Matthias Klose
ohh, and maybe drop the python2.7 recommends as well.

Bug#812602: don't recommend a specific python3.x version

2016-01-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:sigil Version: 0.9.2+dfsg+dfsg-2 please don't recommend a specific python3.x version, just python3, and even that doesn't seem to be necessary. btw, why the +dfsg+dfsg in the version?