On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:22:54 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 05:28:56PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:03:51 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
[...]
> > Could you please clarify?
> > Thanks for your time and patience!
>
> Ahem. Now I pushed my commit :)
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 05:28:56PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:03:51 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
>
> > > > I did so in the git repo of the package. That way, I will not forget.
> > >
> > > Is it visible on a public repository? Where?
> >
> >
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:03:51 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> > > I did so in the git repo of the package. That way, I will not forget.
> >
> > Is it visible on a public repository? Where?
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/po4a.git
I am probably misunderstanding something, since I
> > I did so in the git repo of the package. That way, I will not forget.
>
> Is it visible on a public repository? Where?
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/po4a.git
Bye, Mt.
--
It is not in improving the candle technology that
electricty was discovered, understood and mastered.
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:40:05 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:48:58PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:16:21 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> >
> > > Of course I did not change the debian/changelog yet.
> >
> > Nor the debian/copyright file,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:48:58PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:16:21 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
>
> > Of course I did not change the debian/changelog yet.
>
> Nor the debian/copyright file, obviously.
> But please remember to do so, when you upload the new version to
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:16:21 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for your work.
You're welcome!
> I read your patch and files, and they seem
> really good, so I commited them upstream.
Thank you so much!
> Of course I did not change the debian/changelog yet.
[...]
Nor the
Control: tags + fixed-upstream
Control: tags + pending
Hello,
thanks for your work. I read your patch and files, and they seem
really good, so I commited them upstream. Of course I did not change
the debian/changelog yet.
Thanks a lot,
Mt.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:45:25PM +0200, Francesco
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:15:38 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 04:03:47PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > Hello,
Hi!
> >
> > it took me a while, but I had a look at your code, at least. Your new
> > module seem very reasonnable to me, thank you.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 04:03:47PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it took me a while, but I had a look at your code, at least. Your new
> module seem very reasonnable to me, thank you.
>
> The thing is that I don't quite understand the tests. Could you please
> give your files
Hello,
it took me a while, but I had a look at your code, at least. Your new
module seem very reasonnable to me, thank you.
The thing is that I don't quite understand the tests. Could you please
give your files sensible names? Have a look at how the AsciiDoc tests
are organized: they are in
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:01:28 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:39:05 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:52:12 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> >
> > > > Are you willing to convert my tests to a proper test integrated in po4a
> > > > test infrastructure?
> >
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:39:05 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:52:12 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
>
> > > Are you willing to convert my tests to a proper test integrated in po4a
> > > test infrastructure?
> > > I really hope you are, since I am not knowledgeable enough to do so
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:52:12 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> > Are you willing to convert my tests to a proper test integrated in po4a
> > test infrastructure?
> > I really hope you are, since I am not knowledgeable enough to do so by
> > myself...
>
> Yes I am.
That's wonderful news! Thank you
> Are you willing to convert my tests to a proper test integrated in po4a
> test infrastructure?
> I really hope you are, since I am not knowledgeable enough to do so by
> myself...
Yes I am. But that's 10 years since the last time I added something
into the t/ directory, so I have to check
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 00:04:43 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 02:40:49 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
>
[...]
> > A first point would be to convert your tests to a proper test of our
> > infrastructure, somewhere under t/ Once you have some automated tests,
> > I will happily
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 02:40:49 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
[...]
> I had a quick lookup at your work, and it looks very promising to me.
I'm glad to read this, thanks for your fast feedback.
>
> A first point would be to convert your tests to a proper test of our
> infrastructure, somewhere
Hello Francesco,
I had a quick lookup at your work, and it looks very promising to me.
A first point would be to convert your tests to a proper test of our
infrastructure, somewhere under t/ Once you have some automated tests,
I will happily integrate your work in the main archive.
Then, the
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:00:11 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> Hello Francesco,
Hello Martin,
thank you so much for writing me!
Your message is really appreciated, as I was just going to send an
update today (an astonishing coincidence!).
>
> did you manage to do any progress on this front?
It
Hello Francesco,
did you manage to do any progress on this front? Is there anything I
could do to help?
Mt
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:00:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:36:46 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> Hello Martin, thanks for your prompt reply.
>
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:36:46 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Martin, thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> the truth is that the development of po4a is kinda stopped since a few
> years. We do the basic maintainance, like reviewing and applying
> proposed patches (with some delays), but
Hello,
the truth is that the development of po4a is kinda stopped since a few
years. We do the basic maintainance, like reviewing and applying
proposed patches (with some delays), but I don't manage to devote any
time to the new wanted features myself. I'm sorry about that, but this
is a fact.
Package: po4a
Version: 0.47-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello and thanks for developing po4a.
As discussed on the po4a-devel mailing list [1], it would be great
if po4a supported the Ruby document format [2].
[1] https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/po4a-devel/2016-June/002364.html
[2]
23 matches
Mail list logo
