Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

2016-09-06 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Niels, > Thanks for the patch! :) Thanks again for the review. :) > If the test does not need anything special from d/rules we have a > standard one Ah, good to know... Removed. > Should the regex have a "/" (or use $basename eq '.coverage'[1])? > AFAICT this would also match

Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

2016-09-06 Thread Niels Thykier
Chris Lamb: > tags 831864 + patch > thanks > > Hi Lintian maintainers, > Hi, Thanks for the patch! :) Two minor remarks > Attached is the following: > > commit 707a5c5965f4349735e185caaf18f7af022d279f > Author: Chris Lamb > Date: Wed Aug 24 19:12:16 2016 +0100 >

Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

2016-08-24 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 831864 + patch thanks Hi Lintian maintainers, Attached is the following: commit 707a5c5965f4349735e185caaf18f7af022d279f Author: Chris Lamb Date: Wed Aug 24 19:12:16 2016 +0100 c/files: Warn about Python packages which ship coverage.py information.

Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

2016-07-21 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Axel Beckert wrote: > I don't know too much about doing coverage computations in Python, but > this looks wrong twice (i.e. for both packages): > > Unpacking python-rows (0.2.0-1) over (0.1.1-3) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/python-rows_0.2.0-1_all.deb

Bug#831864: lintian: Should warn about python packages which ship coverage information

2016-07-20 Thread Axel Beckert
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.45 Severity: wishlist Hi, I don't know too much about doing coverage computations in Python, but this looks wrong twice (i.e. for both packages): Unpacking python-rows (0.2.0-1) over (0.1.1-3) ... dpkg: error processing archive