-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/16 21:32, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:05:38PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> I exactly means this: it is not just cysignals, but also, according to
>> the
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:17:54PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> > PARI 2.8.1 will be released in about one month and will be API/ABI
> > incompatible with 2.8.0. Then PARI 2.9.0 will be released.
> > We should focus on PARI 2.9.0 and not be
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:05:38PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> I exactly means this: it is not just cysignals, but also, according to
> the Debian Sage page, at least eclib, lcalc. The list might be longer
> because any mathematical software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/16 17:22, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Jerome BENOIT:
>> On 06/09/16 15:52, Bill Allombert wrote:
>>> PARI 2.8.1 will be released in about one month and will be
>>> API/ABI incompatible with 2.8.0. Then PARI 2.9.0 will be
>>> released. We should
Bill Allombert:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 06:31:28PM +0200, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
>> I think PARI has a particular convention about even vs odd minor version
>> numbers,
>> so 2.7.x and 2.8.x don't work the same.
>>
>> See
>> http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/faq.html#versioninfo
>
> Exactly so.
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 06:31:28PM +0200, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
> I think PARI has a particular convention about even vs odd minor version
> numbers,
> so 2.7.x and 2.8.x don't work the same.
>
> See
> http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/faq.html#versioninfo
Exactly so. Old timers might remember
I think PARI has a particular convention about even vs odd minor version
numbers,
so 2.7.x and 2.8.x don't work the same.
See
http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/faq.html#versioninfo
Jerome BENOIT:
> On 06/09/16 15:52, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> PARI 2.8.1 will be released in about one month and will be API/ABI
>> incompatible with 2.8.0. Then PARI 2.9.0 will be released.
>> We should focus on PARI 2.9.0 and not be distracted with 2.8.0.
>
It's not usual for FOSS projects to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks for your reply,
On 06/09/16 15:52, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Hi, thanks for your reply.
>>
>> On 01/09/16 20:29, Bill
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi, thanks for your reply.
>
> On 01/09/16 20:29, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 02:37:11PM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> >> Source: pari
> >> Severity:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 02:37:11PM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> Source: pari
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> it appears that the current sage[math] (version 7.3) cannot build
> against PARI 2.7,
> while is might against PARI 2.8.0.alpha .
As far as I understand SAGE
Source: pari
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
it appears that the current sage[math] (version 7.3) cannot build
against PARI 2.7,
while is might against PARI 2.8.0.alpha .
As a lot of dependencies of sage[math] and sage[math] itself depend on
PARI, having
12 matches
Mail list logo
