I've comited the change, but it still FTBFS due to #852023
Le 21/01/17 à 13:23, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
Thanks! Let me know if you can’t get around to it, and I’ll be happy
to give a hand.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le 19/01/17 à 19:52,
Thanks! Let me know if you can’t get around to it, and I’ll be happy
to give a hand.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le 19/01/17 à 19:52, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
>>
>> [+aquette, bigon directly]
>>
>> Are you aware of this issue? This RC bug
Le 19/01/17 à 19:52, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
[+aquette, bigon directly]
Are you aware of this issue? This RC bug transitively marked freeradius
for removal from testing. If you need help, please let me know — I have
some incentive to look into it in order to keep freeradius in stretch.
Hi Michael,
No idea on the why and not much time to look at it before the week end.
Iirc, dblatex is listed for the manpages generation.
Feel free to upload a fix if you find one.
Thanks and cheers.
Arno
Le 19 janv. 2017 19:57, "Michael Stapelberg" a
écrit :
>
[+aquette, bigon directly]
Are you aware of this issue? This RC bug transitively marked freeradius
for removal from testing. If you need help, please let me know — I have
some incentive to look into it in order to keep freeradius in stretch.
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> Source:
Source: nut
Version: 2.7.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170111 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
6 matches
Mail list logo