Quoting Niko Tyni (2017-06-26 21:50:33)
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 08:36:41PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > Hm. Is there a difference between:
> > perl -I. Build.PL # debhelper
> > perl Build.PL -I. # cdbs
>
> Yes, there seems to be.
>
> The essential part of the diff of the generated
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 cdbs
Control: retitle -2 cdbs: perl Build.PL -I. doesn't have the intended effect
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:31:15AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hmm - I guess the special code in Module::Build checks for . only at the
> _end_ (or beginning?) of the
Quoting gregor herrmann (2017-06-26 20:36:41)
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:02:01 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> > > FWIW, I've scheduled a test rebuild of all the 679 libmodule-build-perl
> > > reverse build dependencies on perl.debian.net to get a feeling of
> > > how widespread this issue actually is.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:29:16 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Affected packages:
> >
> > libtest-name-fromline-perl_0.13-1
> > libregexp-log-perl_0.06-3
> > libperl-critic-perl_1.126-1
> > libparser-mgc-perl_0.15-1
> > libnet-proxy-perl_0.12-6
> > libmoox-options-perl_4.023-1
> >
[posting only to bugreport - seems all others are subscribed]
Quoting Niko Tyni (2017-06-26 20:02:01)
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:57:14PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:19:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
>>> I feel like we should try and not diverge further from
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:50:33PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 08:36:41PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > Hm. Is there a difference between:
> > perl -I. Build.PL # debhelper
> > perl Build.PL -I. # cdbs
>
> Yes, there seems to be.
I note that Dominic's patch in
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 08:36:41PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Hm. Is there a difference between:
> perl -I. Build.PL # debhelper
> perl Build.PL -I. # cdbs
Yes, there seems to be.
The essential part of the diff of the generated Build files
from debhelper style to cdbs style is:
@@ -31,7
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:02:01 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > FWIW, I've scheduled a test rebuild of all the 679 libmodule-build-perl
> > reverse build dependencies on perl.debian.net to get a feeling of
> > how widespread this issue actually is.
> Not that widespread. We have 12 clearly affected
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:57:14PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:19:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > I feel like we should try and not diverge further from upstream; that
> > seems almost guaranteed to end up with similar issues later.
>
> FWIW, I've scheduled a
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:19:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 07:43:52PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > So it looks like we really need PERL_USE_UNSAFE_INC, and we might
> > want to insert it unconditionally manually where we did prior to the
> > accidental
Control: reassign -1 libmodule-build-perl 0.422400-1
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/Perl-Toolchain-Gang/Module-Build/issues/77
Control: affects src:libcatmandu-sru-perl
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 21:19:43 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 07:43:52PM +0200, gregor
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 07:43:52PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:22:52 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > > So what is not there anymore is PERL_USE_UNSAFE_INC=1.
> >
> > Dom, I think you're our expert on dot-in-inc; do you think my hunch
> > is correct that we need to
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:22:52 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > So what is not there anymore is PERL_USE_UNSAFE_INC=1.
>
> Dom, I think you're our expert on dot-in-inc; do you think my hunch
> is correct that we need to add PERL_USE_UNSAFE_INC back?
> (And if yes, where would be the best place -
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:33:27 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Basically the diff between 0.422000-1 (with our changes) and 0.422400-1
> (with a different fix and without our patch) is:
>
>
> @@ -1824,6 +1824,11 @@ sub print_build_script {
>my $shebang = $self->_startperl;
>my
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:01:26 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Some recent change in unstable makes this package FTBFS:
>
> Probably libmodule-build-perl_0.422400-1 though I don't really know why,
> given the changelog says
> - Remove 0003-Make-Module-Build-set-PERL_UNSAFE_INC.patch (fixed
>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 08:49:19PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: libcatmandu-sru-perl
> Version: 0.039-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Some recent change in unstable makes this package FTBFS:
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/libcatmandu-sru-perl.html
>
Source: libcatmandu-sru-perl
Version: 0.039-1
Severity: serious
Some recent change in unstable makes this package FTBFS:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/libcatmandu-sru-perl.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libcatmandu-sru-perl.html
17 matches
Mail list logo
