Am 17.10.2017 um 17:20 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:30:16PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> I ran the Oracle JavaFX demos with the new version and it worked fine
>> (except the media player but this isn't a regression, something is
>> probably misconfigured on my
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:30:16PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I ran the Oracle JavaFX demos with the new version and it worked fine
> (except the media player but this isn't a regression, something is
> probably misconfigured on my machine).
>
> Should I proceed with the upload, or do you
I ran the Oracle JavaFX demos with the new version and it worked fine
(except the media player but this isn't a regression, something is
probably misconfigured on my machine).
Should I proceed with the upload, or do you want to do it directly?
Emmanuel Bourg
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:27:02PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick update on openjfx: the package is back on track, as of version
> 8u141-b14-3 I eventually managed to get it to build on both amd64 and
> i386 in unstable for the first time since January. If the tests go well
> I'll
Hi,
Quick update on openjfx: the package is back on track, as of version
8u141-b14-3 I eventually managed to get it to build on both amd64 and
i386 in unstable for the first time since January. If the tests go well
I'll prepare the security update next week.
Emmanuel Bourg
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 05:09:29PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 2/10/2017 à 15:08, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
>
> > Java maintainers, shall we follow the procedures for openjdk and
> > rebase to a new upstream release in stretch?
>
> Yes please, that's the only sustainable solution for
Le 2/10/2017 à 15:08, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
> Java maintainers, shall we follow the procedures for openjdk and
> rebase to a new upstream release in stretch?
Yes please, that's the only sustainable solution for openjfx. I'll
prepare the update for unstable first and I'll let you know when
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 09:58:53PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: openjfx
> Version: 8u131-b11-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream security
>
> Hi,
>
> the following vulnerabilities were published for openjfx.
>
> CVE-2017-10086[0] and CVE-2017-10114[1].
>
> Unfortunately it's
Source: openjfx
Version: 8u131-b11-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream security
Hi,
the following vulnerabilities were published for openjfx.
CVE-2017-10086[0] and CVE-2017-10114[1].
Unfortunately it's no more details possilby know as shared via [2],
which states that the supported versions
9 matches
Mail list logo
