Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-09-18 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Nicholas, > orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature is triggered when upstream > signs their uncompressed tarball instead of tarball.{gz,bz2,xz}. […] > For the record, is it now necessary to repack the orig.tar for cases > like these? I'm unsure I'm afraid, but my gut reaction is tha that

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-09-17 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Chris! On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 02:37:32PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 871957 + pending > thanks > > Added the "repack" bit here: > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=6094948b0e09b997df75dbc748cef25d4ada44c0 I was directed to this bug from

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-09-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Guido, > > Lintian can detect that the tarball was repacked by looking inside > > at the first few tar members - a repacked tarball is meant to > > contain only a foo_1.2.3.orig/ directory (devref §6.7.8.2.4) […] > > Don't see a reference to filtering debian/copyright however? > > That

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-09-10 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 05:01:17PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Guido, > > > control: reopen -1 > > It's not closed yet - still pending release! ;) > > > See #874663. Looking at filter in debian/copyright and at the dir name > > of the tarball¹ (as Simon suggested) > > This bit... > >

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-09-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Guido, > control: reopen -1 It's not closed yet - still pending release! ;) > See #874663. Looking at filter in debian/copyright and at the dir name > of the tarball¹ (as Simon suggested) This bit... Lintian can detect that the tarball was repacked by looking inside at the first few

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-09-10 Thread Guido Günther
control: reopen -1 Hi Chris, On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 01:26:35PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > forcemerge 871957 874659 > thanks > > Hi Guido, > > > orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks > > This was fixed in #874659. :) I think this is (unfortunately) not enough to

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-09-10 Thread Chris Lamb
forcemerge 871957 874659 thanks Hi Guido, > orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks This was fixed in #874659. :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-09-08 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 871957 + pending thanks Fixed in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=8914bb025f975e4a5584a3a0203cf808f3d0a430 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-08-13 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 871957 + pending thanks Added the "repack" bit here: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=6094948b0e09b997df75dbc748cef25d4ada44c0 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#871957: [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should exclude repacks

2017-08-12 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 871957 + pending thanks Thanks for the report. This was fixed a little while ago in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=8914bb025f975e4a5584a3a0203cf808f3d0a430 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org /