On 2017-08-14 19:40, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2017-08-14 18:21:07 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-08-13 23:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > Something needs to be done to avoid that. Shouldn't the
> > > /usr/include/asm symbolic link be provided either by libc6-dev-i386
> > > or by the
On 2017-08-14 18:21:07 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-08-13 23:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Something needs to be done to avoid that. Shouldn't the
> > /usr/include/asm symbolic link be provided either by libc6-dev-i386
> > or by the individual gcc-X-multilib packages, for instance? In
On 2017-08-13 23:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Something needs to be done to avoid that. Shouldn't the
> /usr/include/asm symbolic link be provided either by libc6-dev-i386
> or by the individual gcc-X-multilib packages, for instance? In such a
> case, libc6-dev-i386 would no longer need to
Package: gcc-multilib
Version: 4:7.1.0-2
Severity: wishlist
gcc-multilib currently provides two independent features:
1. the /usr/include/asm symbolic link (which has nothing to do with a
specific GCC version);
2. depends on the default GCC version (currently via gcc-7-multilib).
Because on
4 matches
Mail list logo
