On 2021-01-09 21:12:24, Maximilian Stein wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 10:34:31 +0100 Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>> Where do we stand with this effort. I'd love to see passff in Debian.
> As an
>> alternative browserpass seems to work with both, Firefox and Chrome.
>
> Has there been any progress on
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 10:34:31 +0100 Michael Meskes wrote:
> Where do we stand with this effort. I'd love to see passff in Debian.
As an
> alternative browserpass seems to work with both, Firefox and Chrome.
Has there been any progress on packaging passff? I'd love to see it in
Debian, too.
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:46:33PM +0800, Yao Wei wrote:
> I later found out that the package is not ready for Chromium yet, but
> anyways I started the thread in debian-devel and pkg-mozext-maintainers
> now.
>
> Also found out that the package ublock-origin has been maintained by
> pkg-mozext
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 06:33:48AM -0400, Paul Wise wrote:
> I don't think either firefox-passff or passff is an appropriate name
> for webextensions. I'd suggest instead to prefix it with webextension-
> or webext-, but you probably should start a discussion on debian-devel
> about that.
>
> I'd
On 08/21/2017 07:47 AM, Yao Wei (魏銘廷) wrote:
> This package should be placed under collab-maint for comaintaining.
I've packaged this a while ago, feel free to use it:
https://sources.progress-linux.org/distributions/dschinn-backports-extras/packages/passff/
Regards,
Daniel
signature.asc
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Yao Wei wrote:
> ITP: firefox-passff -- pass manager extension for Firefox
> * Package name: passff
I don't think either firefox-passff or passff is an appropriate name
for webextensions. I'd suggest instead to prefix it with webextension-
or webext-, but you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: =?utf-8?b?WWFvIFdlaSAo6a2P6YqY5bu3KQ==?=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: passff
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Nathan Wallace
* URL :
7 matches
Mail list logo