Hi Mattia,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:44:18PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:59:34PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Attached patch supports both adt-rn and autopkgtest so we can continue
> > to build in wheezy and jessie.
>
> ooohhh, I remembered there were some
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:59:34PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Attached patch supports both adt-rn and autopkgtest so we can continue
> to build in wheezy and jessie.
ooohhh, I remembered there were some simple bugs lying around while I
was doing the upload, but I didn't actually looked to the
control: tags -1 +patch
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:24:09PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 20:57 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:14:05AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> > > I was trying to build some packages in sid and discovered that the
> > >
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 20:57 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:14:05AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> > I was trying to build some packages in sid and discovered that the
> > chroot B20autopkgtest hook script was using /usr/bin/adt-run which
> > has
> > been removed in
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:14:05AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> I was trying to build some packages in sid and discovered that the
> chroot B20autopkgtest hook script was using /usr/bin/adt-run which has
> been removed in autopkgtest 5.0
oh, thanks for the bug!
> Should autopkgtest have a Breaks:
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.228.8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I was trying to build some packages in sid and discovered that the
chroot B20autopkgtest hook script was using /usr/bin/adt-run which has
been removed in autopkgtest 5.0
Should autopkgtest have a Breaks: pbuilder (<= 0.228.8)?
6 matches
Mail list logo
