Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-10-14 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 10 Oct 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: >On Fri, 06 Oct 2017, Breno Leitao wrote: >> >>This means that your clean rules is not cleaning everything that was >>generated during the build process. > >I'll prepare a new version with that fixed. Hi, Breno, Lukas, I have fixed the problem with

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-10-10 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On Fri, 06 Oct 2017, Breno Leitao wrote: >I am just doing a final review for the sponsor, and I found something >that annoys every developer, it seems that pragha does not re-builds >after an initial build. > >It builds fine for the very first time, but if you try to re-build, the >directory

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-10-06 Thread Breno Leitao
Hello Gabriel, On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:05:58PM +0200, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > it seems you are getting the knack of it quickly :) . I don't have > any additional feedback. I hope you're able to find a sponsor soon. I am just doing a final review for the sponsor, and I

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-09-27 Thread Breno Leitao
Hi Gabriel, On 09/26/2017 04:05 PM, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote: Hi Gabriel, it seems you are getting the knack of it quickly :) . I don't have any additional feedback. I hope you're able to find a sponsor soon. I also re-reviewed the package, and it seems OK for me, although I must admit I

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-09-26 Thread Lukas Schwaighofer
Hi Gabriel, it seems you are getting the knack of it quickly :) . I don't have any additional feedback. I hope you're able to find a sponsor soon. You can also look at the available packaging teams [1]. For your package it looks like the Debian Multimedia teamĀ [2] would be the most suitable

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-09-25 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Hi, Lukas, Thanks again for the explanations. You are a good professor! :) On 25 Sep 2017, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote: >If you want to keep using git-buildpackage, I'd suggest you do the >following: > >Add a file debian/gbp.conf with the following contents and commit it: >=== >[DEFAULT]

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-09-25 Thread Lukas Schwaighofer
Hi Gabriel, thanks for the git link, makes things easier for me. > Where did you get pragha-1.3.3.tar.gz from? > I got it from > https://github.com/pragha-music-player/pragha/archive/v1.3.3.tar.gz. I got the same one (but I used `uscan -dd` to download, which uses the debian/watch file and also

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-09-24 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Hi, Lukas, Thanks for the new round of reviews. You're making me learn a ton. :) On 24 Sep 2017, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote: >On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:15:41 -0300 >"Gabriel F. T. Gomes" wrote: >> >> In that same message [1], you suggested the use of a version control

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-09-24 Thread Lukas Schwaighofer
Hi Gabriel, thanks for improving upon our suggestions. On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:15:41 -0300 "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" wrote: > Lukas, > In that same message [1], you suggested the use of a version control > system, but I don't know where to make it public (I know that

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-09-24 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Breno, Lukas (CC) pointed out some problems [1] with the packaging of Pragha. For instance, the fact that I did not open a RFS properly. I should have sent the RFS message to sub...@bugs.debian.org, not to #592985. This is a proper RFS (I think I got it right this time). :) [1]

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-09-24 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pragha" * Package name: pragha Version : 1.3.3-1 Upstream Author : Matias De lellis * URL : https://pragha-music-player.github.io/ *