On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:35:50PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:59:39PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > a.) using /opt/etc and shipping files there is fine today and piuparts
> > should not complain here
> Could you briefly explain in which way the most recent FHS
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:01:07AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Holger, this one (#888546) is the bug that you reported. If you think
> it is really a bug in piuparts, feel free to reassign again.
well, this bug is about a file/directory vanishing and I think it is
correct that piuparts
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 05:15:48PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:40 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
> > What I said is that no sane package in Debian/main should need to put
> > files directly in /etc/opt. That's an oddity, a very unorthodox thing,
> > it would be like a Debian
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> chrome-gnome-shell (in this case) is an addon for the Google Chrome web
>> browser. Since Chrome installs to /opt/ (which is encouraged by FHS),
>> /etc/opt/ is the only standards-compliant location for
>> chrome-gnome-shell to ship the
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 14:57:47 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > There is no reason this functionality cannot be offered in Debian. We
> > got complaints when we supported other browsers but not Google Chrome.
>
> Since Google Chrome is not part of Debian, shouldn't this
>
unmerge 888546
reassign 888546 chrome-gnome-shell
thanks
With this unmerge and reassign, I'm keeping each bug where they were
originally reported.
Holger, this one (#888546) is the bug that you reported. If you think
it is really a bug in piuparts, feel free to reassign again.
[ After this I
Hi,
Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:40 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
>> What I said is that no sane package in Debian/main should need to put
>> files directly in /etc/opt. That's an oddity, a very unorthodox thing,
>> it would be like a Debian package in main putting stuff directly
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:59:39PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> a.) using /opt/etc and shipping files there is fine today and piuparts
> should not complain here
Could you briefly explain in which way the most recent FHS is more
permissive than previous releases?
If we allow using /etc/opt
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 05:15:48PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:40 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
> > What I said is that no sane package in Debian/main should need to put
> > files directly in /etc/opt. That's an oddity, a very unorthodox thing,
> > it would be like a Debian
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:40 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
> What I said is that no sane package in Debian/main should need to put
> files directly in /etc/opt. That's an oddity, a very unorthodox thing,
> it would be like a Debian package in main putting stuff directly in /opt.
chrome-gnome-shell (in
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:47:16PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:41:49PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:28:18PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > > Can we reassing this already, please?
> >
> > for those watching along:
> > - #93390 is
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:41:49PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:28:18PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Can we reassing this already, please?
>
> for those watching along:
> - #93390 is closed.
> - #888549 is assigned to chrome-gnome-shell
I was referring to #888243,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:28:18PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 01:23:32PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>
> > References
> >
> > [...]
> > - https://bugs.debian.org/93390
>
> Are you serious?
[...]
> Can we reassing this already, please?
for those
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 01:38:19PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:31 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Please reassign. This is not a bug in base-files.
>
> Let's specifically talk about https://bugs.debian.org/888549 . You
> opened that bug claiming that chrome-gnome-shell
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 01:23:32PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> References
>
> [...]
> - https://bugs.debian.org/93390
Are you serious?
Such bug was in 2001-04-10, but in 2001-11-09 I modified base-files
to provide the opt directories, this is from the changelog:
base-files
Santiago, can we revisit this?
Debian Policy § 9.1.1 since 4.1.5.0 requires compliance with FHS 3.0
and I don't see any listed exception for /etc/opt/ .
FHS 3.0 § 3.7.2 requires /etc/opt/ . (§ 3.2 also requires /opt)
References
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
