Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4 -- summary of situation

2018-04-14 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Dmitry, Gianfranco, I did some research and testing into this bug... On Sat, Apr 14 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > Hello. I am a bit lost about state of this RFS, but it seems I did > stupid thing with format=1.0; complicating sponsoring. > > Let me settle things, provide sane package

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-04-14 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat, Apr 14 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > Hello. I am a bit lost about state of this RFS, but it seems I did > stupid thing with format=1.0; complicating sponsoring. > > Let me settle things, provide sane package with format=3.0 (quilt), > with pristine tar. I will ping once I am

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-04-14 Thread KAction
control: tag -1 moreinfo [2018-04-13 16:37] Gianfranco Costamagna > Hello, > > >The next thing you might try is `git deborig`. But I understand just > >asking Dmitry! Hello. I am a bit lost about state of this RFS, but it seems I did stupid thing with format=1.0;

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-04-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, >The next thing you might try is `git deborig`. But I understand just >asking Dmitry! git deborig -f upstream/3.14 same effect, as well as git deborig -f v3.14... G.

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-04-13 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Fri, Apr 13 2018, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Please try typing `origtargz`. > > > it downloads the current one in the archive, without the patches, and > then it fails with: Ah, sorry, I thought it would invoke uscan. The next thing you might try is `git deborig`. But I

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-04-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, >Please try typing `origtargz`. it downloads the current one in the archive, without the patches, and then it fails with: dpkg-source: warning: the diff modifies the following upstream files: .git/HEAD .git/config .git/description .git/hooks/applypatch-msg.sample

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-04-12 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu, Apr 12 2018, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I'm worried about the disappear of "debian-changes" patch, is it > somewhere else? should I get a new orig tarball? I don't want my > upload to make something disappear from the patch queue, due to my > lack of dgit procedures. It's

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-04-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hello Dmitry sorry for taking too long for this one. I did: grab inotify-tools from experimental grab the debian directory from the git repo, and debdiffed the results. I'm worried about the disappear of "debian-changes" patch, is it somewhere else?

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-14 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed, Feb 14 2018, Sean Whitton wrote: > If you do this, please upload using `dgit push-source` since Dmitry is > using a dgit-based workflow. > > (you can just run `dgit push-source` and it should do everything for > you) Oh, plus --overwrite since the last upload to unstable was not

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-14 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Gianfranco, On Wed, Feb 14 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > Hello! Gianfranco, could you please consider building and, probably, > sponsoring this package? We have issue, that it FTBFS on Sean's setup, > but builds on mine and on debomatic. As debomatic admin notified, > debomatic is not

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-14 Thread KAction
> > [2018-02-12 13:07] Sean Whitton > >> > Last version is at bacef877c2f9293f9e1fd624b32d5306d7bc3c27 Maybe, > >> > you could try again? > >> > >> Still FTBFSs. Log attached. > >> > >> I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date. > > > > Stange. Just did

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-13 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Dmitry, On Tue, Feb 13 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > [2018-02-12 13:07] Sean Whitton >> > Last version is at bacef877c2f9293f9e1fd624b32d5306d7bc3c27 Maybe, >> > you could try again? >> >> Still FTBFSs. Log attached. >> >> I suspect that the debomatic sid

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-13 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Tue, Feb 13 2018, Luca Falavigna wrote: > 2018-02-13 4:18 GMT+01:00 : >>> I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date. > > amd64 chroot was updated on Sunday, February 11, 2018 4:20:10 PM UTC > (1518366010.2514317). Thanks for the feedback! -- Sean

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-13 Thread Luca Falavigna
2018-02-13 4:18 GMT+01:00 : >> I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date. amd64 chroot was updated on Sunday, February 11, 2018 4:20:10 PM UTC (1518366010.2514317). -- Cheers, Luca

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-12 Thread KAction
[2018-02-12 13:07] Sean Whitton > > Last version is at bacef877c2f9293f9e1fd624b32d5306d7bc3c27 Maybe, you > > could try again? > > Still FTBFSs. Log attached. > > I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date. Stange. Just did 'sbuild-update -udcar', and

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-12 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Mon, Feb 12 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > Last version is at bacef877c2f9293f9e1fd624b32d5306d7bc3c27 Maybe, you > could try again? Still FTBFSs. Log attached. I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date. -- Sean Whitton

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-12 Thread KAction
[2018-02-10 12:13] Sean Whitton > - It FTBFSs for me. Log attached. Look, debomatic build is succesful: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/inotify-tools/3.14-4/buildlog Last version is at bacef877c2f9293f9e1fd624b32d5306d7bc3c27 Maybe, you

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-12 Thread KAction
[2018-02-10 12:13] Sean Whitton > Review of 3c46a878fd294e9af9f8e7c225d16e8aceb960cf: > > - It looks like you added an entry to the changelog for 3.13-3 that > should have been in the changelog for 3.13-4. Good catch. Will fix it. > - I'm not sure that

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-10 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Hello Dmitry, Review of 3c46a878fd294e9af9f8e7c225d16e8aceb960cf: - It looks like you added an entry to the changelog for 3.13-3 that should have been in the changelog for 3.13-4. - I'm not sure that DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 will have any

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

2018-02-09 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inotify-tools" * Package name : inotify-tools Version : 3.14-4 Upstream Author : Radu Voicilas * Url :